Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;83(3):149-54.
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.83.3.149. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for left intrahepatic duct stones

Affiliations

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for left intrahepatic duct stones

Chi-Young Jeong et al. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The feasibility of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for the management of intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones was evaluated.

Methods: The clinical data of 26 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for IHD stones at Gyeongsang National University Hospital between January 2009 and June 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: The mean operation time was 312.1 ± 63.4 minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.8 ± 5.0 days. There were 2 cases of postoperative bile leakage and 3 cases of intra-abdominal fluid collection, which were successfully managed conservatively. Remnant stones were detected in 2 patients. The initial success rate of stone clearance was 92.3% (24 of 26). The remnant stones were located in the common bile duct in both cases and were removed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Therefore, the final success rate of stone clearance was 100% (26 of 26). During a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 7 to 36 months), there was no patient with recurrent stone.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery could be an effective treatment modality for the management of IHD stones in select patients.

Keywords: Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Position of trocars. The operator used 3rd and 4th trocar on the right side of the patient and the assistant used 2 trocars on the left side.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Procedures of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. (A) Hepatic artery had been dissected and ligated by hem-O-lock. (B) Left portal vein was dissected and clamped. (C) Intraoperative choledochoscopy was performed to confirm residual stone. (D) The duct was closed with intracorporeal sutures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang MH, Chen CH, Yang JC, Yang CC, Yeh YH, Chou DA, et al. Long-term outcome of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for hepatolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2655–2662. - PubMed
    1. Lee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, Park ET, Lim BC, Kim HJ, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evaluation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:318–323. - PubMed
    1. Jan YY, Chen MF, Wang CS, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Chen SC. Surgical treatment of hepatolithiasis: long-term results. Surgery. 1996;120:509–514. - PubMed
    1. Cheung MT, Kwok PC. Liver resection for intrahepatic stones. Arch Surg. 2005;140:993–997. - PubMed
    1. Han HS, Yi NJ. Laparoscopic treatment of intrahepatic duct stone. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:157–162. - PubMed