Surgeon practice patterns for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery
- PMID: 22983271
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31826446ba
Surgeon practice patterns for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery
Abstract
Objective: To assess surgeon practice patterns for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery.
Methods: A survey was distributed at the 2011 annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons regarding antibiotic prophylaxis practices.
Results: The response rate was 51%. Most surgeons did not use antibiotic prophylaxis for dilation and curettage without products of conception, hysteroscopy, and loop electrocautery excision procedure/cone biopsy. For laparoscopy without graft placement, 45.9% did not use prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was common for hysterectomy. For midurethral slings, 8.2% did not use prophylaxis. When graft material was used in prolapse surgery, at least 93% of surgeons administered some form of antibiotic prophylaxis. Only 70% of respondents prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy consistent with recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, whereas 78% are consistent with specifications from the Joint Commission.
Conclusions: Wide variability exists in antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery. Surgeon preference or local hospital policies affect choice of prophylaxis less than 14.9% of the time.
Comment in
-
Slings: perioperative antibiotics-yes, postoperative antibiotics-no.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):51. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31827b20bb. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23321660 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
