Randomized trial of partial vs. stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up
- PMID: 22983407
- DOI: 10.1177/0022034512460403
Randomized trial of partial vs. stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up
Abstract
This randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of 2 treatments for deep caries lesions - partial caries removal (PCR) and stepwise excavation (SW) - with respect to the primary outcome of pulp vitality for a 3-year follow-up period. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with permanent molars presenting deep caries lesions (lesion affecting ≥ 1/2 of the dentin on radiographic examination), positive response to a cold test, absence of spontaneous pain, negative sensitivity to percussion, and absence of periapical lesions (radiographic examination). Teeth randomly assigned to PCR (test) received incomplete caries removal and filling in a single session. Outcome success was evaluated by assessment of pulp vitality, determined by pulp sensitivity to a cold test and the absence of periapical lesions. Data were analyzed by a Weibull regression model with shared frailty term (survival analysis). At baseline, 299 treatments were executed: PCR, 152 and SW, 147. By the end of the 3-year follow-up period, 213 teeth had been evaluated. Adjusted survival rates were 91% for PCR and 69% for SW (p = 0.004). These results suggest that there is no need to re-open a cavity and perform a second excavation for pulp vitality to be preserved (Clinical trials registration NCT00887952).
Comment in
-
Reentry may not be needed after partial caries removal in mainly young permanent molars with caries involving half or more of the dentin thickness.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013 Jun;13(2):62-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.04.008. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013. PMID: 23773470 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical