Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Feb;260(2):470-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6659-3. Epub 2012 Sep 16.

A randomized controlled trial of intranasal-midazolam versus intravenous-diazepam for acute childhood seizures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of intranasal-midazolam versus intravenous-diazepam for acute childhood seizures

Arpita Thakker et al. J Neurol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of midazolam given intranasally with diazepam given intravenously in the treatment of acute childhood seizures. A randomized controlled study was conducted in a pediatric emergency department in a tertiary general hospital. Fifty children aged from 1 month to 12 years presenting with acute seizures of at least 10 min duration were enrolled during a 12 month period. Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and intravenous diazepam (0.3 mg/kg) were administered. The main outcome measures were interval between arrival at hospital and starting treatment and interval between arrival at hospital and cessation of seizures. Intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam were equally effective. Overall 18 of 27 seizures were controlled with midazolam and 15 of 23 with diazepam. The mean interval between arrival at hospital and starting treatment was significantly shorter in the midazolam group [3.37 min (SD 2.46)] as compared to the diazepam group [14.13 min (SD 3.39)]. The mean interval between cessation of seizures and arrival at hospital was significantly shorter in the midazolam group [6.67 min (SD 3.12)] as compared to the diazepam group [17.18 min (SD 5.09)]. The mean interval between control of seizures and administration of the drug was shorter in the diazepam group [2.67 min (SD 2.31)] as compared to the midazolam group [3.01 min (SD 2.79)]. No significant side effects were observed in either group. Seizures were controlled more quickly with intravenous diazepam than with intranasal midazolam. Midazolam was as safe and effective as diazepam. The overall interval between arrival at hospital and cessation of seizures was shorter with intranasal midazolam than with intravenous diazepam. The intranasal route can be possibly used not only in medical centres, but with appropriate instruction by the parents of children with acute seizures at home.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 May;51(5):732 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;41(4):355-7 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997 Apr;13(2):92-4 - PubMed
    1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Feb;39(2):137-8 - PubMed
    1. J Emerg Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;8(2):155-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources