Predicting copper concentrations in acid mine drainage: a comparative analysis of five machine learning techniques
- PMID: 22983612
- DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2859-7
Predicting copper concentrations in acid mine drainage: a comparative analysis of five machine learning techniques
Abstract
Acid mine drainage (AMD) is a global problem that may have serious human health and environmental implications. Laboratory and field tests are commonly used for predicting AMD, however, this is challenging since its formation varies from site-to-site for a number of reasons. Furthermore, these tests are often conducted at small-scale over a short period of time. Subsequently, extrapolation of these results into large-scale setting of mine sites introduce huge uncertainties for decision-makers. This study presents machine learning techniques to develop models to predict AMD quality using historical monitoring data of a mine site. The machine learning techniques explored in this study include artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine with polynomial (SVM-Poly) and radial base function (SVM-RBF) kernels, model tree (M5P), and K-nearest neighbors (K-NN). Input variables (physico-chemical parameters) that influence drainage dynamics are identified and used to develop models to predict copper concentrations. For these selected techniques, the predictive accuracy and uncertainty were evaluated based on different statistical measures. The results showed that SVM-Poly performed best, followed by the SVM-RBF, ANN, M5P, and KNN techniques. Overall, this study demonstrates that the machine learning techniques are promising tools for predicting AMD quality.
Similar articles
-
Uncertainty quantification and integration of machine learning techniques for predicting acid rock drainage chemistry: a probability bounds approach.Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.125. Epub 2014 May 21. Sci Total Environ. 2014. PMID: 24852616
-
Development of early-warning protocol for predicting chlorophyll-a concentration using machine learning models in freshwater and estuarine reservoirs, Korea.Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jan 1;502:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 19. Sci Total Environ. 2015. PMID: 25241206
-
Application of nano remediation of mine polluted in acid mine drainage water using machine learning model.Chemosphere. 2023 Jan;311(Pt 2):136926. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136926. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Chemosphere. 2023. PMID: 36272625
-
Current approaches for mitigating acid mine drainage.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;226:1-32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6898-1_1. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23625128 Review.
-
Mine Drainage Generation and Control Options.Water Environ Res. 2016 Oct;88(10):1409-32. doi: 10.2175/106143016X14696400495136. Water Environ Res. 2016. PMID: 27620096 Review.
Cited by
-
Neuro-Particle Swarm Optimization Based In-Situ Prediction Model for Heavy Metals Concentration in Groundwater and Surface Water.Toxics. 2022 Feb 18;10(2):95. doi: 10.3390/toxics10020095. Toxics. 2022. PMID: 35202281 Free PMC article.
-
Flexible Data Trimming Improves Performance of Global Machine Learning Methods in Omics-Based Personalized Oncology.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 22;21(3):713. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030713. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 31979006 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of individual and ensemble machine learning models for prediction of sulphate levels in untreated and treated Acid Mine Drainage.Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Mar 2;196(4):332. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12467-8. Environ Monit Assess. 2024. PMID: 38429461 Free PMC article.
-
FLOating-Window Projective Separator (FloWPS): A Data Trimming Tool for Support Vector Machines (SVM) to Improve Robustness of the Classifier.Front Genet. 2019 Jan 15;9:717. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00717. eCollection 2018. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 30697229 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Neural Netw. 2006 Mar;19(2):113-21 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources