Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;78(22):8089-95.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02470-12. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Quantification of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in dairy wastewater ponds

Affiliations

Quantification of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in dairy wastewater ponds

Robert S Dungan et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Zoonotic pathogens in land-applied dairy wastewaters are a potential health risk. The occurrence and abundance of 10 pathogens and 3 fecal indicators were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in samples from 30 dairy wastewaters from southern Idaho. Samples tested positive for Campylobacter jejuni, stx(1)- and eaeA-positive Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, and Salmonella enterica, with mean recoveries of genomic DNA corresponding to 10(2) to 10(4) cells ml(-1) wastewater. The most predominant organisms were C. jejuni and M. avium, being detected in samples from up to 21 and 29 of 30 wastewater ponds, respectively. The qPCR detection limits for the putative pathogens in the wastewaters ranged from 16 cells ml(-1) for M. avium to 1,689 oocysts ml(-1) for Cryptosporidium. Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp., Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and pathogenic Leptospira spp. were not detected by qPCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Comparison of culture-dependent and qPCR estimates of numbers of enterococci, E. coli, and C. perfringens in the dairy wastewaters from (A) June, (B) August, and (C) October. Quantitative PCR was based on positive amplification of target genes using EC, Eco, and cpa primers for enterococci, E. coli, and C. perfringens, respectively. Columns represent means ± standard deviations (n = 30). Columns with different letters (a or b) indicate a significant difference between the two quantification techniques (P < 0.05).

References

    1. Armon R, Payment P. 1988. A modified m-CP medium for enumerating Clostridium perfringens from water samples. Can. J. Microbiol. 34: 78–79 - PubMed
    1. Budnick GE, Howard RT, Mayo DR. 1996. Evaluation of Enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 3881–3884 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman PA, Siddons CA, Cerman Malo AT, Harkin MA. 1997. A 1-year study of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry. Epidemiol. Infect. 119: 245–250 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cobbold RN, Rice DH, Szymanski M, Call DR, Hancock DD. 2004. Comparison of shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli prevalences among dairy, feedlot, and cow-calf herds in Washington state. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 4375–4378 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook KL, Britt JS. 2007. Optimization of methods for detecting Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in environmental samples using quantitative, real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 69: 154–160 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources