Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;2(2):123-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.02.001.

Community engagement on the Thai-Burmese border: rationale, experience and lessons learnt

Affiliations

Community engagement on the Thai-Burmese border: rationale, experience and lessons learnt

Phaik Yeong Cheah et al. Int Health. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Community engagement is increasingly promoted in developing countries, especially in international health research, but there is little published experience. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) conducts research with refugees, migrant workers, displaced people, and day migrants on the Thai-Burmese border, and has recently facilitated the set up of the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB). Valuable lessons have been learnt from consultation with the T-CAB especially in the area of participant recruitment and the informed consent process. A lot of new research questions have emerged from consultation with the T-CAB. This paper describes our experience, lessons learnt and the unique challenges faced working with the T-CAB from its initial conception to date. We conclude that consultation with the T-CAB has made improvements in our research in particular operational and ethical aspects of our studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the location of the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit office in Mae Sot, Tak Province, Thailand, and the Mae La refugee camp and the clinics along the Thai-Burmese border.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A typical Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB) meeting: Members are discussing a participant information sheet of a randomised controlled trial. Photo by Viriya Hantrakun.

References

    1. Morin SF, Morfit S, Maiorana A, Aramrattana A, Goicochea P, Mutsambi JM, et al. Building community partnerships: case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. Clin Trials. 2008;5:147–56. - PubMed
    1. Cox LE, Rouff JR, Svendsen KH, Markowitz M, Abrams DI. Community advisory boards: their role in AIDS clinical trials. Terry Beirn community programs for clinical research on AIDS. Health Soc Work. 1998;23:290–7. - PubMed
    1. Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat genet. 1999;23:275–80. - PubMed
    1. Shubis K, Juma O, Sharifu R, Burgess B, Abdulla S. Challenges of establishing a Community Advisory Board (CAB) in a low-income, low-resource setting: experiences from Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;17:16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marsh V, Kamuya D, Rowa Y, Gikonyo C, Molyneux S. Beginning community engagement at a busy biomedical research programme: Experiences from the KEMRI CGMRC-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:721–33. - PMC - PubMed