Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(9):e44456.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044456. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

Ovulatory shifts in women's attractions to primary partners and other men: further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness

Affiliations

Ovulatory shifts in women's attractions to primary partners and other men: further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness

Christina M Larson et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Previous research has documented shifts in women's attractions to their romantic partner and to men other than their partner across the ovulation cycle, contingent on the degree to which her partner displays hypothesized indicators of high-fitness genes. The current study set out to replicate and extend this finding. Forty-one couples in which the woman was naturally cycling participated. Female partners reported their feelings of in-pair attraction and extra-pair attraction on two occasions, once on a low-fertility day of the cycle and once on a high-fertility day of the cycle just prior to ovulation. Ovulation was confirmed using luteinizing hormone tests. We collected two measures of male partner sexual attractiveness. First, the women in the study rated their partner's sexual attractiveness. Second, we photographed the partners and had the photos independently rated for attractiveness. Shifts in women's in-pair attractions across the cycle were significantly moderated by women's ratings of partner sexual attractiveness, such that the less sexually attractive women rated their partner, the less in-pair attraction they reported at high fertility compared with low fertility (partial r = .37, p(dir) = .01). Shifts in women's extra-pair attractions across the cycle were significantly moderated by third-party ratings of partner attractiveness, such that the less attractive the partner was, the more extra-pair attraction women reported at high relative to low fertility (partial r = -.33, p(dir) = .03). In line with previous findings, we found support for the hypothesis that the degree to which a woman's romantic partner displays indicators of high-fitness genes affects women's attractions to their own partner and other men at high fertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relationship between women’s reports of in-pair attraction at high fertility, relative to low fertility, and women’s ratings of partner sexual attractiveness.
Points represent residual scores controlling for order of sessions. N = 41, partial r = .37, p dir = .01.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationship between women’s reports of extra-pair attraction at high fertility, relative to low fertility, and composite third-party ratings of women’s partner’s attractiveness.
Points represent residual scores controlling for order of sessions. N = 37, partial r = −.33, p dir = .03.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relationship between women’s reports of extra-pair attraction at high fertility, relative to low fertility, and third-party ratings of women’s partner’s body attractiveness.
Points represent residual scores controlling for order of sessions. N = 37, partial r = −.36, p dir = .02.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relationship between women’s reports of extra-pair attraction at high fertility, relative to low fertility, and third-party ratings of women’s partner’s facial attractiveness.
Points represent residual scores controlling for order of sessions. N = 37, partial r = −.26, p dir = .08.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilcox AJ, Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Trussell J, Baird DD (2001) Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception 63: 211–215. - PubMed
    1. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA (2000) The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav Brain Sci 23: 573–644. - PubMed
    1. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (2008) Human oestrus. Behavioral Ecology 275: 991–1000. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pillsworth EG, Haselton MG (2006) Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extra-pair sex. Annu Rev Sex Res 17: 59–100.
    1. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2008) The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Publication types

Substances