Community biomass and bottom up multivariate nutrient complementarity mediate the effects of bioturbator diversity on pelagic production
- PMID: 22984586
- PMCID: PMC3440345
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044925
Community biomass and bottom up multivariate nutrient complementarity mediate the effects of bioturbator diversity on pelagic production
Abstract
Tests of the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationship have focused little attention on the importance of interactions between species diversity and other attributes of ecological communities such as community biomass. Moreover, BEF research has been mainly derived from studies measuring a single ecosystem process that often represents resource consumption within a given habitat. Focus on single processes has prevented us from exploring the characteristics of ecosystem processes that can be critical in helping us to identify how novel pathways throughout BEF mechanisms may operate. Here, we investigated whether and how the effects of biodiversity mediated by non-trophic interactions among benthic bioturbator species vary according to community biomass and ecosystem processes. We hypothesized that (1) bioturbator biomass and species richness interact to affect the rates of benthic nutrient regeneration [dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and total dissolved phosphorus (TDP)] and consequently bacterioplankton production (BP) and that (2) the complementarity effects of diversity will be stronger on BP than on nutrient regeneration because the former represents a more integrative process that can be mediated by multivariate nutrient complementarity. We show that the effects of bioturbator diversity on nutrient regeneration increased BP via multivariate nutrient complementarity. Consistent with our prediction, the complementarity effects were significantly stronger on BP than on DIN and TDP. The effects of the biomass-species richness interaction on complementarity varied among the individual processes, but the aggregated measures of complementarity over all ecosystem processes were significantly higher at the highest community biomass level. Our results suggest that the complementarity effects of biodiversity can be stronger on more integrative ecosystem processes, which integrate subsidiary "simpler" processes, via multivariate complementarity. In addition, reductions in community biomass may decrease the strength of interspecific interactions so that the enhanced effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes can disappear well before species become extinct.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Biodiversity effects of ecosystem engineers are stronger on more complex ecosystem processes.Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):1977-85. doi: 10.1890/12-1385.1. Ecology. 2013. PMID: 24279269
-
Trophic complementarity drives the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship in food webs.Ecol Lett. 2013 Jul;16(7):853-61. doi: 10.1111/ele.12118. Epub 2013 May 22. Ecol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23692591
-
Predator and prey biodiversity relationship and its consequences on marine ecosystem functioning-interplay between nanoflagellates and bacterioplankton.ISME J. 2018 Jun;12(6):1532-1542. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0111-3. Epub 2018 Apr 27. ISME J. 2018. PMID: 29703955 Free PMC article.
-
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Aug;94(4):1220-1245. doi: 10.1111/brv.12499. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019. PMID: 30724447
-
The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Apr;94(2):648-661. doi: 10.1111/brv.12472. Epub 2018 Oct 7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019. PMID: 30294844 Review.
Cited by
-
Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities.Biogeochemistry. 2017;135(1):121-133. doi: 10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9. Epub 2017 Jun 12. Biogeochemistry. 2017. PMID: 32009694 Free PMC article.
-
Specific arrangements of species dominance can be more influential than evenness in maintaining ecosystem process and function.Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 20;6:39325. doi: 10.1038/srep39325. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27996034 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, et al. (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9: 1146–1156. - PubMed
-
- Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, et al. (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443: 989–992. - PubMed
-
- Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, et al. (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486: 105–108. - PubMed
-
- Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, et al. (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67. - PubMed
-
- Naeem S, Duffy JE, Zavaleta E (2012) The Functions of Biological Diversity in an Age of Extinction. Science 336: 1401–1406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources