Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011
- PMID: 22984897
- PMCID: PMC3524034
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-802
Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011
Abstract
Background: The London Boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark have high levels of sexually transmitted infections including Chlamydia trachomatis. Modelling studies suggest that reductions in the prevalence of chlamydia infection will require a high level of population screening coverage and positivity among those screened. General practice has a potentially important role to play in delivering these levels of coverage since large numbers (up to 60%) of young people visit their general practice every year but previous work suggests that there are barriers to delivering screening in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate an intervention to increase chlamydia screening in general practice within Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) of Lambeth and Southwark, a strategy combining financial incentives and supportive practice visits to raise awareness and solve problems.
Methods: Data on age, gender, venue and chlamydia result for tests on under 25 s in Lambeth from 2003-11 was obtained from the National Chlamydia Screening Programme. We analysed the number and percentage of tests generated in general practice, and looked at the number of practices screening more than 10% of their practice cohort of 15-24 year olds, male/female ratio and positivity rates across other screening venues. We also looked at practices screening less than 10% and studied change over time. We compared data from Lambeth and Southwark with London and England. We also studied features of the level and type of educational and financial incentive interventions employed.
Results: Chlamydia tests performed in general practice increased from 23 tests in 2003-4 to 4813 tests in 2010-11 in Lambeth. In Southwark they increased from 5 tests in 2003/04 to 4321 in 2010/11. In 2011, 44.6% of tests came from GPs in Lambeth and 46% from GP's in Southwark. In Lambeth 62.7% of practices tested more than 10% of their cohort and in Southwark this was 55.8%. In Lambeth, postivity rate in 2010/11 was 5.8% in men and 6.0% in women. In Southwark positivity rate was 3.9% in men and 5.3% in women. In 2003/04 13% tests in general practice (Lambeth) were from men, this increased to 25% in 2010/11. In Southwark this increased from 20% in 2003/04 to 27.6% in 2010/11. We compared the results with London and national data and showed significant differences between GP testing in Lambeth and Southwark, and GP testing in London and the rest of England.
Conclusions: General practices can be important potential providers of chlamydia tests.With a combination of sustained support, financial incentives and feedback on performance, general practice may be able to test a large percentage of 15-24 year olds. General practice is also a potentially important provider of chlamydia tests to young men.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0. Implement Sci. 2016. PMID: 27624835 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-70. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20158918 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2. BMC Fam Pract. 2016. PMID: 27001608 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Designing tailored Web-based instruction to improve practicing physicians' chlamydial screening rates.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):929. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00032. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228099 Review.
-
Developments in the screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;30(4):637-58. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(03)00076-7. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 14719842 Review.
Cited by
-
Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: Screening and Management.J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014 Jan;21(1):30-38. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014. PMID: 25554725 Free PMC article.
-
Community-Directed Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Interventions Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for an E-Delphi Study in Toronto, Canada.JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 4;8(7):e13801. doi: 10.2196/13801. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. PMID: 31274111 Free PMC article.
-
Service evaluation of an educational intervention to improve sexual health services in primary care implemented using a step-wedge design: analysis of chlamydia testing and diagnosis rate changes.BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 2;16:686. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3343-z. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27484823 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Linkages Between Reimbursement and Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;9:750122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750122. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34778183 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consultations for sexually transmitted infections in the general practice in the Netherlands: an opportunity to improve STI/HIV testing.BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 30;3(12):e003687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003687. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 24381253 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dorey MD, Choi YH, Soldan K, VynnyckyModelling the effect of Chlamydia trachomatis testing on the prevalence of infection in England: what impact can we expect from the National Chlamydia Screening Programme? Sex Transm Infect. 10.11.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical