Reporting of quality indicators and improvement in hospital performance: the P.Re.Val.E. Regional Outcome Evaluation Program
- PMID: 22985031
- PMCID: PMC3513610
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01401.x
Reporting of quality indicators and improvement in hospital performance: the P.Re.Val.E. Regional Outcome Evaluation Program
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether reporting of hospital performance was associated with a change in quality indicators in Italian hospitals.
Data sources/study setting: Nationwide Hospital Information System for 2006-2009.
Study design: We performed a pre-post evaluation in Lazio (before and after disclosure of the Regional Outcome Evaluation Program P.Re.Val.E.) and a comparative evaluation versus Italian regions without comparable programs. We analyzed risk-adjusted proportions of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), hip fractures operated on within 48 hours, and cesarean deliveries.
Data collection/extraction methods: Using standardized ICD-9-CM coding algorithms, we selected 381,053 acute myocardial infarction patients, 250,712 hip fractures, and 1,736,970 women who had given birth.
Principal findings: In Lazio PCI within 48 hours changed from 22.49 to 29.43 percent following reporting of the P.Re.Val.E results (relative increase, 31 percent; p < .001). In the other regions this proportion increased from 22.48 to 27.09 percent during the same time period (relative increase, 21 percent; p < .001). Hip fractures operated on within 48 hours increased from 11.73 to 15.78 percent (relative increase, 34 percent; p < .001) in Lazio, and not in other regions (29.36 to 28.57 percent). Cesarean deliveries did not decrease in Lazio (34.57-35.30 percent), and only slightly decreased in the other regions (30.49-28.11 percent).
Conclusions: Reporting of performance data may have a positive but limited impact on quality improvement. The evaluation of quality indicators remains paramount for public accountability.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures
References
-
- Agabiti N, Cesaroni G, Picciotto S, Bisanti L, Caranci N, Costa G, Forastiere F, Marinacci C, Pandolfi P, Russo A, Perucci CA, the Italian Study Group on Inequalities in Health Care “The Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Postoperative Complications After Major Elective Cardiovascular Surgery”. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2008;62:882–9. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Angeli F, Del Pinto M, Rasetti G, Patriarchi F, Cocchieri M, Mandorla S, Maragoni G, Giordano G, Giombolini C, Verdecchia P, Romagnoli C, Cavallini C, the Gruppo di Studio Registro Regionale dell'Umbria; Umbria-STEMI “La gestione dell'infarto miocardico acuto con sopraslivellamento del tratto ST nella regione Umbria: risultati del registro prospettico osservazionale Umbria-STEMI”. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 2010;11:393–401. - PubMed
-
- Baker DW, Einstadter D, Thomas CL, et al. “Mortality Trends during a Program That Publicly Reported Hospital Performance”. Medical Care. 2002;40:879–90. - PubMed
-
- Balzi D, Barchielli A, Santoro GM, et al. AMI-Florence Working Group. “Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Real World: A Summary Report from The Ami-Florence Italian Registry”. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2008;3:109–15. - PubMed
-
- Belizán JM, Althabe F, Cafferata ML. “Health Consequences of the Increasing Caesarean Section Rates”. Epidemiology. 2007;18:485–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
