Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia
- PMID: 22985372
- DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1258
Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia
Abstract
Object: Primary outcome measures for the upper limb in trials concerning human spinal cord injury (SCI) need to distinguish between functional and neurological changes and require satisfying psychometric properties for clinical application.
Methods: The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) was developed by the International GRASSP Research and Design Team as a clinical outcome measure specific to the upper limbs for individuals with complete and incomplete tetraplegia (that is, paralysis or paresis). It can be administered across the continuum of recovery after acute cervical SCI. An international multicenter study (involving centers in North America and Europe) was conducted to apply the measure internationally and examine its applicability.
Results: The GRASSP is a multimodal test comprising 5 subtests for each upper limb: dorsal sensation, palmar sensation (tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments), strength (tested with motor grading of 10 muscles), and prehension (distinguishes scores for qualitative and quantitative grasping). Thus, administration of the GRASSP results in 5 numerical scores that provide a comprehensive profile of upper-limb function. The established interrater and test-retest reliability for all subtests within the GRASSP range from 0.84 to 0.96 and from 0.86 to 0.98, respectively. The GRASSP is approximately 50% more sensitive (construct validity) than the International Standards of Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) in defining sensory and motor integrity of the upper limb. The subtests show concurrence with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), SCIM self-care subscales, and Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) (the strongest concurrence to impairment is with self-perception of function [CUE], 0.57-0.83, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The GRASSP was found to demonstrate reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity for use as a standardized upper-limb impairment measure for individuals with complete or incomplete tetraplegia. Responsiveness (follow-up from onset to 1 year postinjury) is currently being tested in international studies (in North America and Europe). The GRASSP can be administered early after injury, thus making it a tool that can be administered in acute care (in the ICU), rehabilitation, and outpatient clinics.
Similar articles
-
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12. J Neurotrauma. 2012. PMID: 21568688 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):755-66. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565466. Epub 2015 Jan 7. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. PMID: 25567122
-
Defining the role of sensation, strength, and prehension for upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jan;28(1):66-74. doi: 10.1177/1545968313490998. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014. PMID: 23778700
-
Advanced Assessment of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Three-Tiered Approach to Characterizing Paralysis.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):206-216. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-206. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29997424 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative testing in spinal cord injury: overview of reliability and predictive validity.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(1 Suppl):141-50. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.AOSPINE1296. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22985380 Review.
Cited by
-
Monitoring Upper Limb Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Insights beyond Assessment Scores.Front Neurol. 2016 Aug 31;7:142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00142. eCollection 2016. Front Neurol. 2016. PMID: 27630612 Free PMC article.
-
Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for Spinal Cord Injury.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019 Spring;25(2):121-131. doi: 10.1310/sci2502-121. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 31068744 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying neurodegeneration of the cervical cord and brain in degenerative cervical myelopathy: A multicentre study using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.Eur J Neurol. 2024 Jul;31(7):e16297. doi: 10.1111/ene.16297. Epub 2024 May 7. Eur J Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38713645 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Assist-As-Needed Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Parallel-Group Controlled Trial.Front Neurorobot. 2017 Jun 13;11:26. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00026. eCollection 2017. Front Neurorobot. 2017. PMID: 28659784 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale, design and critical end points for the Riluzole in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (RISCIS): a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled parallel multi-center trial.Spinal Cord. 2016 Jan;54(1):8-15. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.95. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Spinal Cord. 2016. PMID: 26099215 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical