Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Feb;162(2):343-8.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Effects of maternal sensitivity and cognitive and linguistic stimulation on cochlear implant users' language development over four years

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effects of maternal sensitivity and cognitive and linguistic stimulation on cochlear implant users' language development over four years

Alexandra L Quittner et al. J Pediatr. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effects of observed maternal sensitivity (MS), cognitive stimulation (CS), and linguistic stimulation on the 4-year growth of oral language in young, deaf children receiving a cochlear implant. Previous studies of cochlear implants have not considered the effects of parental behaviors on language outcomes.

Study design: In this prospective, multisite study, we evaluated parent-child interactions during structured and unstructured play tasks and their effects on oral language development in 188 deaf children receiving a cochlear implant and 97 normal-hearing children as controls. Parent-child interactions were rated on a 7-point scale using the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Early Childcare Study codes, which have well-established psychometric properties. Language was assessed using the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories, the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, and the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language.

Results: We used mixed longitudinal modeling to test our hypotheses. After accounting for early hearing experience and child and family demographics, MS and CS predicted significant increases in the growth of oral language. Linguistic stimulation was related to language growth only in the context of high MS.

Conclusion: The magnitude of effects of MS and CS on the growth of language was similar to that found for age at cochlear implantation, suggesting that addressing parenting behaviors is a critical target for early language learning after implantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Compares language development, measured by language age between A, age at implantation, B, high and low MS, and C, the interaction between MS and LS. Compares normal hearing and cochlear implant users, D, divided by age at implantation, E, divided by high and low MS, and F, divided by the interactions between MS and LS, on language delay at 48 months post-implanation.

References

    1. Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:153–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marschark M, Spencer PE. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
    1. Barker DH, Quittner AL, Fink NE, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Niparko JK, et al. Predicting behavior problems in deaf and hearing children: the influences of language, attention, and parent–child communication. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21:373–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldassari CM, Schmidt CS, Schubert CM, Srinivasan P, Dodson KM, Sismanis A. Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:114–9. - PubMed
    1. Geers AE, Brenner C, Davidson LS. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear. 2003;24:24S–35S. - PubMed

Publication types