Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules
- PMID: 2298810
- PMCID: PMC2116015
- DOI: 10.1083/jcb.110.2.391
Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules
Abstract
To examine the dependence of poleward force at a kinetochore on the number of kinetochore microtubules (kMTs), we altered the normal balance in the number of microtubules at opposing homologous kinetochores in meiosis I grasshopper spermatocytes at metaphase with a focused laser microbeam. Observations were made with light and electron microscopy. Irradiations that partially damaged one homologous kinetochore caused the bivalent chromosome to shift to a new equilibrium position closer to the pole to which the unirradiated kinetochore was tethered; the greater the dose of irradiation, the farther the chromosome moved. The number of kMTs on the irradiated kinetochore decreased with severity of irradiation, while the number of kMTs on the unirradiated kinetochore remained constant and independent of chromosome-to-pole distance. Assuming a balance of forces on the chromosome at congression equilibrium, our results demonstrate that the net poleward force on a chromosome depends on the number of kMTs and the distance from the pole. In contrast, the velocity of chromosome movement showed little dependence on the number of kMTs. Possible mechanisms which explain the relationship between the poleward force at a kinetochore, the number of kinetochore microtubules, and the lengths of the kinetochore fibers at congression equilibrium include a "traction fiber model" in which poleward force producers are distributed along the length of the kinetochore fibers, or a "kinetochore motor-polar ejection model" in which force producers located at or near the kinetochore pull the chromosomes poleward along the kMTs and against an ejection force that is produced by the polar microtubule array and increases in strength toward the pole.
Similar articles
-
Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length.J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):374-89. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.374. J Cell Biol. 1982. PMID: 7096444 Free PMC article.
-
Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle.J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;124(3):223-33. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.3.223. J Cell Biol. 1994. PMID: 8294508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microtubule assembly and kinetochore directional instability in vertebrate monopolar spindles: implications for the mechanism of chromosome congression.J Cell Sci. 1994 Jan;107 ( Pt 1):285-97. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.1.285. J Cell Sci. 1994. PMID: 8175915
-
Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells.J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81-95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. J Cell Biol. 1990. PMID: 2295685 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanics of chromosome alignment at the spindle midplane.Curr Biol. 2021 May 24;31(10):R574-R585. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.082. Curr Biol. 2021. PMID: 34033791 Review.
Cited by
-
Using Photobleaching to Measure Spindle Microtubule Dynamics in Primary Cultures of Dividing Drosophila Meiotic Spermatocytes.J Biomol Tech. 2015 Jul;26(2):66-73. doi: 10.7171/jbt.15-2602-004. J Biomol Tech. 2015. PMID: 25802491 Free PMC article.
-
The HhH2/NDD domain of the Drosophila Nod chromokinesin-like protein is required for binding to chromosomes in the oocyte nucleus.Genetics. 2005 Dec;171(4):1823-35. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047464. Epub 2005 Sep 2. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 16143607 Free PMC article.
-
Maloriented bivalents have metaphase positions at the spindle equator with more kinetochore microtubules to one pole than to the other.Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec;15(12):5346-55. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-06-0524. Epub 2004 Sep 22. Mol Biol Cell. 2004. PMID: 15385630 Free PMC article.
-
The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.J Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;130(4):941-8. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.4.941. J Cell Biol. 1995. PMID: 7642709 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Feb;11(2):91-102. doi: 10.1038/nrm2832. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010. PMID: 20068571 Free PMC article. Review.