Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;54(2):177-83.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.99537.

Euthanasia: An Indian perspective

Affiliations

Euthanasia: An Indian perspective

Vinod K Sinha et al. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

In our society, the palliative care and quality of life issues in patients with terminal illnesses like advanced cancer and AIDS have become an important concern for clinicians. Parallel to this concern has arisen another controversial issue-euthanasia or "mercy -killing" of terminally ill patients. Proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) feel that an individual's right to autonomy automatically entitles him to choose a painless death. The opponents feel that a physician's role in the death of an individual violates the central tenet of the medical profession. Moreover, undiagnosed depression and possibility of social 'coercion' in people asking for euthanasia put a further question mark on the ethical principles underlying such an act. These concerns have led to strict guidelines for implementing PAS. Assessment of the mental state of the person consenting to PAS becomes mandatory and here, the role of the psychiatrist becomes pivotal. Although considered illegal in our country, PAS has several advocates in the form of voluntary organizations like "death with dignity" foundation. This has got a fillip in the recent Honourable Supreme Court Judgment in the Aruna Shaunbag case. What remains to be seen is how long it takes before this sensitive issue rattles the Indian legislature.

Keywords: Euthanasia; palliative care; physician-assisted suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown JH, Henteleff P, Barakat S. Is it normal for terminally ill patients to desire death? Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:208–11. - PubMed
    1. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M. Prevalence of depression in the terminally ill: Effects of diagnostic criteria and symptom threshold judgments. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:537–40. - PubMed
    1. Nadeau R. Gentles, Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: The Current Debate. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Co. Limited; 1995. Charting the Legal Trends; p. 727.
    1. Decisions near the end of life. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: American Medical Association. JAMA. 1992;267:2229–33. - PubMed
    1. Yount L. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. New York: Facts On File, Inc; 2000.