Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;5(3):233-7.
doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.99690.

Utility of admission physiology in the surgical triage of isolated ballistic battlefield torso trauma

Affiliations

Utility of admission physiology in the surgical triage of isolated ballistic battlefield torso trauma

Jonathan J Morrison et al. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: An assessment of hemodynamic stability is central to surgical decision-making in the management of battlefield ballistic torso trauma (BBTT).

Aims: To analyse the utility of admission physiological parameters in characterising hemodynamic stability.

Settings and design: A retrospective analysis of consecutive admissions, with BBTT, to forward surgical facility in Afghanistan.

Materials and methods: The cohorts' admission physiology, need for operative intervention, and mortality data were collected retrospectively. The cohort was divided into patients requiring surgery for Life-Threatening Torso Hemorrhage (LTTH) and those not requiring immediate surgery (non-LTTH).

Statistical analysis: Parameters were compared using two sample t tests, Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, and Chi-square tests. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to identify significant parameters and determine optimum cut-off values.

Results: A total of 103 patients with isolated BBTT were identified: 44 in the LTTH group and 59 in the non-LTTH group. The mean New Injury Severity Score ± Standard Deviation (NISS±SD) was 28±14 and 13±12, respectively. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure, shock index (SI=heart rate/SBP) and base excess were analysed. SI correlated best with the need for surgical torso hemorrhage control, P<0.05. An optimal cut-off of 0.9 was identified, producing a positive and negative predictive value of 81% and 82%, respectively.

Conclusions: Shock index (SI) is a useful parameter for helping military surgeons triage BBTT, identifying patients requiring operative torso hemorrhage control. SI performance requires a normal physiological response to hypovolemia, and thus should always be considered in clinical context.

Keywords: Battlefield torso trauma; shock index; trauma surgery; triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patient selection
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Receiver operator characteristic curve for Shock Index predicting torso hemorrhage
Figure 3
Figure 3
Decision plot of predictive value per SI cut-off value

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Como JJ, Bokhari F, Chiu WC, Duane TM, Holevar MR, Tandoh MA, et al. Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2010;68:721–33. - PubMed
    1. Morrison JJ, Clasper JC, Gibb I, Midwinter M. Management of penetrating abdominal trauma in the conflict environment: The role of computed tomography scanning. World J Surg. 2011;35:27–33. - PubMed
    1. Wood AM, Trimble K, Louden MA, Jansen J. Selective non-operative management of ballistic abdominal solid organ injury in the deployed military setting. J R Army Med Corps. 2010;156:21–4. - PubMed
    1. Smith JE, Midwinter M, Lambert AW. Avoiding cavity surgery in penetrating torso trauma: The role of the computed tomography scan. Ann R Coll Surg of Engl. 2010;92:486–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME. A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma. 1989;29:623–9. - PubMed