Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
- PMID: 22989511
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.019
Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Gemcitabine is the mainstay treatment for advanced disease. However, almost all up-to-date trials, that evaluated the benefit of gemcitabine-combination schedules, failed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS). In this study, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based combination regimens as compared to gemcitabine alone in the management of pancreatic cancer.
Methods: Clinical trials were collected by searching different databases (PubMed, Embase and the Central Registry of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library) and abstracts from major cancer meetings. We considered period ranging from January 1997 to January 2012. Primary end-point was OS, secondary end-points were response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Hazard ratios (HRs) of OS, odds-ratios (ORs) of RR, DCR and risk ratios of grade 3-4 toxicity rates (TRs), were extracted as presented in retrieved studies and used for statistical analysis. Meta-analytic estimates were derived using random-effects model.
Findings: Thirty-four trials for a total of 10,660 patients were selected and included in the final analysis. The analysis showed that combination chemotherapy confers benefit in terms of OS (HR: 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.97; p=0.001). ORs for both RR and DCR demonstrated a significant advantage for combination therapy (OR for RR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.47-0.76, p<0.001; OR for DCR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.66-0.93; p=0.006). Toxicities were more frequent with the combination treatment and significance in terms of risk ratio was reached for diarrhoea (0.53, 95%CI: 0.36-0.79), nausea (0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.96), neutropenia (0.71, 95%CI: 0.59-0.85) and thrombocytopenia (0.57, 95%CI: 0.43-0.75).
Interpretation: The combination chemotherapy as compared to gemcitabine alone significantly improves OS in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, this advantage is marginal whereas the treatment-related toxicity is increased, suggesting the use of gemcitabine-based combination regimens only in selected patient populations. New prospective trials, based on translational approaches and innovative validated biomarkers, are eagerly awaited on this topic.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis on resected pancreatic cancer: a comparison between adjuvant treatments and gemcitabine alone.BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4948-7. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30352573 Free PMC article.
-
Considering gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy as a potential treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials.Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jul;74(7):e13510. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13510. Epub 2020 Apr 29. Int J Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 32279393 Review.
-
A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials in combination gemcitabine with erlotinib in the pancreatic cancer.Chin Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct;13(5):66. doi: 10.21037/cco-24-45. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Chin Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39390917
-
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25790948
-
Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Jun;16(3):236-244. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60022-5. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017. PMID: 28603091 Review.
Cited by
-
Long noncoding RNA GSTM3TV2 upregulates LAT2 and OLR1 by competitively sponging let-7 to promote gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer.J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 12;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0777-7. J Hematol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31514732 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Cost of Care for Commercially Insured versus Medicare Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Who Received Guideline-Recommended Therapies.Am Health Drug Benefits. 2021 Jun;14(2):70-78. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2021. PMID: 34267862 Free PMC article.
-
Network meta-analysis of randomized trials in multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory patients.Blood Adv. 2017 Feb 27;1(7):455-466. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003905. eCollection 2017 Feb 28. Blood Adv. 2017. PMID: 29296961 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacometabolomics Identifies 3-Hydroxyadipic Acid, d-Galactose, Lysophosphatidylcholine (P-16:0), and Tetradecenoyl-l-Carnitine as Potential Predictive Indicators of Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 29;9:1524. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01524. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32064236 Free PMC article.
-
Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer.Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):495-501. doi: 10.1038/nature14169. Nature. 2015. PMID: 25719666 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical