Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Sep 18;14(5):e119.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.2183.

Smartphone versus pen-and-paper data collection of infant feeding practices in rural China

Shuyi Zhang  1 , Qiong Wu, Michelle Hmmt van Velthoven, Li Chen, Josip Car, Igor Rudan, Yanfeng Zhang, Ye Li, Robert W Scherpbier
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Smartphone versus pen-and-paper data collection of infant feeding practices in rural China

Shuyi Zhang et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (MNCH) household survey data are collected mainly with pen-and-paper. Smartphone data collection may have advantages over pen-and-paper, but little evidence exists on how they compare.

Objective: To compare smartphone data collection versus the use of pen-and-paper for infant feeding practices of the MNCH household survey. We compared the two data collection methods for differences in data quality (data recording, data entry, open-ended answers, and interrater reliability), time consumption, costs, interviewers' perceptions, and problems encountered.

Methods: We recruited mothers of infants aged 0 to 23 months in four village clinics in Zhaozhou Township, Zhao County, Hebei Province, China. We randomly assigned mothers to a smartphone or a pen-and-paper questionnaire group. A pair of interviewers simultaneously questioned mothers on infant feeding practices, each using the same method (either smartphone or pen-and-paper).

Results: We enrolled 120 mothers, and all completed the study. Data recording errors were prevented in the smartphone questionnaire. In the 120 pen-and-paper questionnaires (60 mothers), we found 192 data recording errors in 55 questionnaires. There was no significant difference in recording variation between the groups for the questionnaire pairs (P = .32) or variables (P = .45). The smartphone questionnaires were automatically uploaded and no data entry errors occurred. We found that even after double data entry of the pen-and-paper questionnaires, 65.0% (78/120) of the questionnaires did not match and needed to be checked. The mean duration of an interview was 10.22 (SD 2.17) minutes for the smartphone method and 10.83 (SD 2.94) minutes for the pen-and-paper method, which was not significantly different between the methods (P = .19). The mean costs per questionnaire were higher for the smartphone questionnaire (¥143, equal to US $23 at the exchange rate on April 24, 2012) than for the pen-and-paper questionnaire (¥83, equal to US $13). The smartphone method was acceptable to interviewers, and after a pilot test we encountered only minor problems (eg, the system halted for a few seconds or it shut off), which did not result in data loss.

Conclusions: This is the first study showing that smartphones can be successfully used for household data collection on infant feeding in rural China. Using smartphones for data collection, compared with pen-and-paper, eliminated data recording and entry errors, had similar interrater reliability, and took an equal amount of time per interview. While the costs for the smartphone method were higher than the pen-and-paper method in our small-scale survey, the costs for both methods would be similar for a large-scale survey. Smartphone data collection should be further evaluated for other surveys and on a larger scale to deliver maximum benefits in China and elsewhere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shots of single-choice, multichoice, number-filling, and text-filling questions for the smartphone questionnaire.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow of study participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time consumption for the conducting the interviews overall and per village for the smartphone and pen-and-paper methods.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J, Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0.S0140-6736(07)61690-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific . WHO/UNICEF Regional Child Survival Strategy: Accelerated and Sustained Action towards MDG 4. Manila: World Health Organization; 2006.
    1. WHO. UNICEF. USAID. AED . UCDAVIS, IFPRI. Indicators for Assessing Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices. Part 1: Definitions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Implementation in the Western Pacific Region World Health Organization, Western Pacific Region. 2012. [2012-08-07]. IMCI and Child Survival http://www.wpro.who.int/child_adolescent_health/documents/info_package1.pdf.
    1. Tomlinson M, Solomon W, Singh Y, Doherty T, Chopra M, Ijumba P, Tsai AC, Jackson D. The use of mobile phones as a data collection tool: a report from a household survey in South Africa. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-51. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/9/511472-6947-9-51 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types