Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Sep;27(5):492-8.
doi: 10.1002/hup.2254.

A retrospective study of clinical usage of quetiapine XR and quetiapine IR in outpatients with schizophrenia in Denmark

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

A retrospective study of clinical usage of quetiapine XR and quetiapine IR in outpatients with schizophrenia in Denmark

Charlotte Emborg et al. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Sep.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: The atypical antipsychotic quetiapine is a first-line treatment for schizophrenia. This non-interventional study (NCT01212575) evaluated the clinical use of its two formulations, extended release (XR) and immediate release (IR), in outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Methods: Patients who had received at least one dose of quetiapine XR and/or IR were included. A dosage ≥400 mg/day was defined as antipsychotic. Medical records data were collected retrospectively.

Results: Of 186 enrolled patients, 99 (53%) and 87 (47%) received quetiapine XR and IR, respectively. Use in antipsychotic dosage was seen for 89% XR versus 63% IR patients (mean daily dose ≥400 mg/day; p < 0.0001). 75% XR and 53% IR patients used dosages ≥600 mg/day (p = 0.0019). Quetiapine XR was used at higher mean daily dosages than IR (748 vs 566 mg/day; p = 0.006). Forty-three patients (23%) used both formulations concomitantly; 55 patients (30%) used either XR or IR. Quetiapine IR was used as-needed in 44 patients (23%); one patient used XR as-needed.

Conclusions: Quetiapine XR was used more often in higher (antipsychotic) dosages; quetiapine IR more frequently on an as-needed administration basis. Concomitant use was seen. These findings probably reflect the different profiles of XR/IR and advocate the need for both formulations to offer treatment choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mean daily dose (mg/day) of quetiapine XR and quetiapine IR versus time (days)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altamura AC, Armadoros D, Jaeger M, Kernish R, Locklear J, Volz HP. Importance of open access to atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a European perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;8:2271–2282. - PubMed
    1. Archer T. Neurodegeneration in schizophrenia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10:1131–1141. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin CM, Scott LJ. Quetiapine extended release: in schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:261–269. - PubMed
    1. Barnes TR, Paton C. Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia: benefits and risks. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:383–399. - PubMed
    1. Bingefors K, Isacson D, Lindström E. Dosage patterns of antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia in Swedish ambulatory clinical practise – a highly individualised therapy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57:263–269. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data