Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;199(4):844-51.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8064.

Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department

Affiliations

Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department

Jay Pahade et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences about receiving radiology results and reviewing the images and findings directly with a radiologist after completion of an examination.

Subjects and methods: A prospective survey of English-speaking outpatients undergoing either nononcologic CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis or nonobstetric ultrasound examinations was completed between December 2010 and June 2011. Responses to survey items such as preferences regarding communication of results, knowledge of a radiologist, and anxiety level before and after radiologist-patient consultation were recorded. The average wait time between the end of the imaging examination and the consultation and the duration of consultation were documented.

Results: Eighty-six patients (43 men, 43 women; mean age, 52 years) underwent 37 CT and 49 ultrasound examinations). Forty-eight patients (56%) identified a radiologist as a physician who interprets images. Before imaging, 70 patients (81%) preferred hearing results from both the ordering provider and the radiologist. This percentage increased to 78 (91%) after consultation (p=0.03). Before consultation, 84 of the 86 patients (98%) indicated they would be comfortable hearing normal results or abnormal results from the person interpreting the examination; the number increased to 85 (99%) after consultation. Eighty-five patients (99%) agreed or strongly agreed that reviewing their examination findings with a radiologist was helpful. Eighty-four patients (98%) indicated they wanted the option of reviewing or always wanted to review future examination findings with a radiologist. After consultation, anxiety decreased in 41 patients (48%), increased in 13 (15%), and was unchanged in 32 (37%) (p=0.0001). The average wait for consultation and the duration of consultation were 9.9 and 10.4 minutes for CT and 1.2 and 7.1 minutes for ultrasound.

Conclusion: Patients prefer hearing examination results from both their ordering provider and the interpreting radiologist. Most patients find radiologist consultation beneficial. Patients are comfortable hearing results from the radiologist, with most displaying decreased anxiety after consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of patients who found reviewing the CT/Ultrasound exam with the radiologist helpful/beneficial (n) (post-encounter survey question 1)

References

    1. Basu PA, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann JA, Spielman SB, Van Dalsem VF, 3rd, Rosenberg JK, Glazer GM. Creating a patient-centered imaging service: determining what patients want. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:605–610. - PubMed
    1. Bassett LW, Bomyea K, Liu S, Sayre J. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers. Radiology. 1995;195:235–238. - PubMed
    1. Berlin L. Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist’s duty? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:809–815. - PubMed
    1. Schreiber MH, Leonard M, Jr, Rieniets CY. Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: survey of patients’ preferences. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:467–469. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman NY, Janus J, Destounis S, Logan-Young W. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:597–599. - PubMed

Publication types