This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1036-8.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61338-5.

Should intravenous catheters be replaced routinely?

Donna Gillies¹, Elisabeth O'Riordan

Affiliations

PMID: 22998700
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61338-5

Comment

Should intravenous catheters be replaced routinely?

Donna Gillies et al. Lancet. 2012.

. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1036-8.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61338-5.

Authors

Donna Gillies¹, Elisabeth O'Riordan

Affiliation

¹ Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia. donna_gillies@wsahs.nsw.gov.au

PMID: 22998700
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61338-5

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.
Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, Marsh N, McGrail MR, French V, Foster L, Gallagher P, Gowardman JR, Zhang L, McClymont A, Whitby M. Rickard CM, et al. Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1066-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22998716 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science