Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis
- PMID: 23001437
- PMCID: PMC3568444
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86
Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis
Abstract
Background: Severe sepsis is a common and costly problem. Although consistently defined clinically by consensus conference since 1991, there have been several different implementations of the severe sepsis definition using ICD-9-CM codes for research. We conducted a single center, patient-level validation of 1 common implementation of the severe sepsis definition, the so-called "Angus" implementation.
Methods: Administrative claims for all hospitalizations for patients initially admitted to general medical services from an academic medical center in 2009-2010 were reviewed. On the basis of ICD-9-CM codes, hospitalizations were sampled for review by 3 internal medicine-trained hospitalists. Chart reviews were conducted with a structured instrument, and the gold standard was the hospitalists' summary clinical judgment on whether the patient had severe sepsis.
Results: Three thousand one hundred forty-six (13.5%) hospitalizations met ICD-9-CM criteria for severe sepsis by the Angus implementation (Angus-positive) and 20,142 (86.5%) were Angus-negative. Chart reviews were performed for 92 randomly selected Angus-positive and 19 randomly-selected Angus-negative hospitalizations. Reviewers had a κ of 0.70. The Angus implementation's positive predictive value was 70.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 51.2%, 90.5%]. The negative predictive value was 91.5% (95% CI: 79.0%, 100%). The sensitivity was 50.4% (95% CI: 14.8%, 85.7%). Specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 92.4%, 100%). Two alternative ICD-9-CM implementations had high positive predictive values but sensitivities of <20%.
Conclusions: The Angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis offers a reasonable but imperfect approach to identifying patients with severe sepsis when compared with a gold standard of structured review of the medical chart by trained hospitalists.
Similar articles
-
Severe sepsis cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population.Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):945-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827466f1. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23385099 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Methods for Identification of Pediatric Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Virtual Pediatric Systems Database.Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):e129-e135. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003541. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 30394917 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data.BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009487. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26700284 Free PMC article.
-
Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24201173 Free PMC article. Review.
-
International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15636651 Review.
Cited by
-
Opening the Debate on the New Sepsis Definition. Medicare's Sepsis Reporting Program: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul 15;194(2):139-41. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0723ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27167169 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Variation in SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) Score Performance in Different Infectious States.J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1217-1222. doi: 10.1177/0885066620944879. Epub 2020 Aug 16. J Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 32799718 Free PMC article.
-
Validation study of German inpatient administrative health data for epidemiological surveillance and measurement of quality of care for sepsis: the OPTIMISE study protocol.BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e035763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035763. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33020079 Free PMC article.
-
Inclusion of social determinants of health improves sepsis readmission prediction models.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1263-1270. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac060. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35511233 Free PMC article.
-
Improvements in Sepsis-associated Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer versus Those without Cancer. A 12-Year Analysis Using Clinical Data.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Apr;17(4):466-473. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201909-655OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020. PMID: 31800299 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angus D, Linde-Zwirble W, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky M. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–10. - PubMed
-
- Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, Sorel M, Selby JV, Go AS. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2155–65. - PubMed
-
- Elixhauser A, Friedman B, Stranges E. Septicemia in US Hospitals, HCUP Statistical Brief #122. Rockville, MD: [accessed 18 November 2011; 2011.]. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb122.pdf.
-
- Quartin AA, Schein RMH, Kett DH, Peduzzi PN. Magnitude and Duration of the Effect of Sepsis on Survival. JAMA. 1997;277:1058–63. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous