Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Nov;99(11):1470-8.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.8889. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy

C Wilasrusmee  1 , B Sukrat, M McEvoy, J Attia, A Thakkinstian
Affiliations
Free PMC article
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy

C Wilasrusmee et al. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendicectomy has gained wide acceptance as an alternative to open appendicectomy during pregnancy. However, data regarding the safety and optimal surgical approach to appendicitis in pregnancy are still controversial.

Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in pregnancy identified using PubMed and Scopus search engines from January 1990 to July 2011. Two reviewers independently extracted data on fetal loss, preterm delivery, wound infection, duration of operation, hospital stay, Apgar score and birth weight between laparoscopic and open appendicectomy groups.

Results: Eleven studies with a total of 3415 women (599 in laparoscopic and 2816 in open group) were included in the analysis. Fetal loss was statistically significantly worse in those who underwent laparoscopy compared with open appendicectomy; the pooled relative risk (RR) was 1·91 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·31 to 2·77) without heterogeneity. The pooled RR for preterm labour was 1·44 (0·68 to 3·06), but this risk was not statistically significant. The mean difference in length of hospital stay was - 0·49 (-1·76 to - 0·78) days, but this was not clinically significant. No significant difference was found for wound infection, birth weight, duration of operation or Apgar score.

Conclusion: The available low-grade evidence suggests that laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnant women might be associated with a greater risk of fetal loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Identification of studies for inclusion in review
Fig 2
Fig 2
Meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes a fetal loss and b preterm labour after laparoscopic (LA) versus open (OA) appendicectomy. Relative risks are shown with 95 per cent confidence intervals
Fig 3
Fig 3
Contour-enhanced funnel plots for studies comparing a fetal loss and b preterm labour after laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Kort B, Katz VL, Watson WJ. The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:371–376. - PubMed
    1. Guttman R, Goldman RD, Koren G. Appendicitis during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2004;50:355–357. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilo NB, Amini D, Landy HJ. Appendicitis and cholecystitis in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:586–596. - PubMed
    1. Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg. 2007;5:192–197. - PubMed
    1. Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, Hinkel M, Gastinger I. Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg. 2004;28:508–511. - PubMed