Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;8(2):112-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00095.x. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Laser beam measurement of abdominal sagittal diameter in obese children: a validation study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laser beam measurement of abdominal sagittal diameter in obese children: a validation study

C E Flodmark et al. Pediatr Obes. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Sagittal diameter (SAD) has been reported to correlate to visceral fat and cardiovascular risk factors. SAD is measured with the individual lying down, halfway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest; it represents the mid-height of the abdomen. The aim of this study was to validate SAD measured using a recently-developed laser beam device (SAD(LDB) ) against SAD measured using MRI (SAD(MRI)).

Methods: Of 48 obese children (25 boys, 23 girls) aged 9-11 years on the waiting list for obesity treatment, 34 agreed to a baseline measurement, which was followed by repeated measurements 6 and 12 months later in 31 and 22 children respectively. MRI was used to examine SAD(MRI) at 5 cm above (SAD(MRI,cra) ) and below (SAD(MRI,cau)) the mid plane of the L4-5 intervertebral disc.

Results: Each of the differences SAD(LBD) - SAD(MRI, cau) and SAD(LBD) - SAD(MRI,cra) was subjected to a repeated-measurements ANOVA; the visit did not have a statistically significant effect in either case (p = 0.19 and p = 0.72, respectively). The difference SAD(LBD) - SAD(MRI, cau) was 1.50 on average (p < 0.0001; CI 1.26-1.74) while the corresponding figure for SAD(LBD) -SAD(MRI, cra) was 1.26 (p < 0.0001; CI 1.04-1.49). Regression of the difference on the mean gave slopes of -0.09 (p = 0.25) and -0.04 (p = 0.57) respectively. Prediction of SAD(MRI) from SAD(LDB) can be performed in different ways: by means of linear regression or by means of an additive correction.

Conclusions: Thus, this laser device can be used instead of MRI to estimate SAD by using a simple correction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

There are no other conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vague J. La différenciation sexuelle, facteur déterminant des formes de l'obésité. Presse Méd. 1947;30:339–340. - PubMed
    1. Okorodudu DO, Jumean MF, Montori VM, et al. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:791–799. - PubMed
    1. Sakuragi S, Abhayaratna K, Gravenmaker KJ, et al. Influence of adiposity and physical activity on arterial stiffness in healthy children: the lifestyle of our kids study. Hypertension. 2009;53:611–616. - PubMed
    1. Sjöström L. A computer-tomography based multicompartment body composition technique and anthropometric predictions of lean body mass, total and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Int J Obes. 1991;15(Suppl. 2):19–30. - PubMed
    1. Björntorp P. Abdominal fat distribution and the metabolic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20(Suppl. 8):S26–S28. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources