Phimosis in children
- PMID: 23002427
- PMCID: PMC3329654
- DOI: 10.5402/2012/707329
Phimosis in children
Abstract
Phimosis is nonretraction of prepuce. It is normally seen in younger children due to adhesions between prepuce and glans penis. It is termed pathologic when nonretractability is associated with local or urinary complaints attributed to the phimotic prepuce. Physicians still have the trouble to distinguish between these two types of phimosis. This ignorance leads to undue parental anxiety and wrong referrals to urologists. Circumcision was the mainstay of treatment for pathologic phimosis. With advent of newer effective and safe medical and conservative surgical techniques, circumcision is gradually getting outmoded. Parents and doctors should a be made aware of the noninvasive options for pathologic phimosis for better outcomes with minimal or no side-effects. Also differentiating features between physiologic and pathologic phimosis should be part of medical curriculum to minimise erroneous referrals for surgery.
References
-
- Steadman B, Ellsworth P. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis. Urologic Nursing. 2006;26(3):181–194. - PubMed
-
- Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman CDAJ. Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):155–158. - PubMed
-
- Shankar KR, Rickwood AMK. The incidence of phimosis in boys. British Journal of Urology International. 1999;84(1):101–102. - PubMed
-
- Dewan PA. Treating phimosis. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):148–150. - PubMed
-
- Van Howe RS. Is neonatal circumcision clinically beneficial? Argument against. Nature Clinical Practice Urology. 2009;6(2):74–75. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources