Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:707329.
doi: 10.5402/2012/707329. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

Phimosis in children

Affiliations

Phimosis in children

Sukhbir Kaur Shahid. ISRN Urol. 2012.

Abstract

Phimosis is nonretraction of prepuce. It is normally seen in younger children due to adhesions between prepuce and glans penis. It is termed pathologic when nonretractability is associated with local or urinary complaints attributed to the phimotic prepuce. Physicians still have the trouble to distinguish between these two types of phimosis. This ignorance leads to undue parental anxiety and wrong referrals to urologists. Circumcision was the mainstay of treatment for pathologic phimosis. With advent of newer effective and safe medical and conservative surgical techniques, circumcision is gradually getting outmoded. Parents and doctors should a be made aware of the noninvasive options for pathologic phimosis for better outcomes with minimal or no side-effects. Also differentiating features between physiologic and pathologic phimosis should be part of medical curriculum to minimise erroneous referrals for surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Steadman B, Ellsworth P. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis. Urologic Nursing. 2006;26(3):181–194. - PubMed
    1. Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman CDAJ. Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):155–158. - PubMed
    1. Shankar KR, Rickwood AMK. The incidence of phimosis in boys. British Journal of Urology International. 1999;84(1):101–102. - PubMed
    1. Dewan PA. Treating phimosis. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):148–150. - PubMed
    1. Van Howe RS. Is neonatal circumcision clinically beneficial? Argument against. Nature Clinical Practice Urology. 2009;6(2):74–75. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources