Does feeding tube insertion and its timing improve survival?
- PMID: 23002947
- PMCID: PMC3470758
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04148.x
Does feeding tube insertion and its timing improve survival?
Abstract
Objectives: To examine survival with and without a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube using rigorous methods to account for selection bias and to examine whether the timing of feeding tube insertion affected survival.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: All U.S. nursing homes (NHs).
Participants: Thirty-six thousand four hundred ninety-two NH residents with advanced cognitive impairment from dementia and new problems eating studied between 1999 and 2007.
Measurements: Survival after development of the need for eating assistance and feeding tube insertion.
Results: Of the 36,492 NH residents (88.4% white, mean age 84.9, 87.4% with one feeding tube risk factor), 1,957 (5.4%) had a feeding tube inserted within 1 year of developing eating problems. After multivariate analysis correcting for selection bias with propensity score weights, no difference was found in survival between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.94-1.13). In residents who were tube-fed, the timing of PEG tube insertion relative to the onset of eating problems was not associated with survival after feeding tube insertion (AHR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.86-1.20, persons with a PEG tube inserted within 1 month of developing an eating problem versus later (4 months) insertion).
Conclusion: Neither insertion of PEG tubes nor timing of insertion affect survival.
© 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, The American Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Teno, Gozalo, Kuo and Mor are affiliated with the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University; Dr.Mitchell is affiliated with Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research; Dr. Rhodes is affiliated with University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dr. Bynum is affiliated with The Dartmouth Institute at Dartmouth Medical School; none of these relationships pose a conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Carey TS, Hanson L, Garrett JM, et al. Expectations and outcomes of gastric feeding tubes. Am J Med. 2006;119:527 e511–526. - PubMed
-
- Finucane TE, Christmas C, Travis K. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: A review of the evidence. JAMA. 1999;282:1365–1370. - PubMed
-
- Gillick MR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:206–210. - PubMed
-
- Rudberg MA, Egleston BL, Grant MD, et al. Effectiveness of feeding tubes in nursing home residents with swallowing disorders. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2000;24:97–102. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
