Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jan;23(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0276. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes comparison

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes comparison

Antonio Biondi et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Despite the theoretical advantages of laparoscopic surgery, it is still not considered the standard treatment for colorectal cancer patients because of criticism concerning oncologic stability. This study aimed at examining the short- and long-term follow-up results of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colorectal cancer and at investigating clinical outcomes, oncologic safety, and any potential advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Subjects and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a database containing the information about patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer from January 2004 to January 2012 at our institution.

Results: The patients who underwent the laparoscopic-assisted procedure showed a significantly faster recovery than those who underwent open surgery, namely, less time to first passing flatus (P=.041), time of first bowel motion (P=.04), time to resume normal diet (P=.043), and time to walk independently (P=.031). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery caused less pain for patients, leading to lower need of analgesic (P=.002) and less hospital recovery time (P=.034), compared with patients who underwent open surgery. No differences were found in 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates.

Conclusions: Our results suggested that the laparoscopic approach was as safe as the open alternative. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery has been shown to be a favorable surgical option with better short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncological control compared with open resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Overall survival of laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection patient groups. Cum, cumulative; mo, months.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Disease-free survival of laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection patient groups. Cum, cumulative; mo, months.

References

    1. Braga M. Vignali A. Gianotti L. Zuliani W. Radaelli G. Gruarin P. Dellabona P. Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: A randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 2002;236:759–766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weeks JC. Nelson H. Gelber S. Sargent D. Schroeder G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287:321–328. - PubMed
    1. Guillou PJ. Quirke P. Thorpe H. Walker J. Jayne DG. Smith AM. Heath RM. Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–1726. - PubMed
    1. Sun J. Jiang T. Qiu Z. Cen G. Cao J. Huang K. Pu Y. Liang H. Huang R. Chen S. Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: A single center retrospective case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–2059. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources