Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jun;16(6):982-8.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004144. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

School food and nutrition policy, monitoring and evaluation in the USA

Affiliations
Review

School food and nutrition policy, monitoring and evaluation in the USA

Jay Hirschman et al. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To provide an overview of school food and nutrition monitoring from 1980 to the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 and data on school food availability in the USA.

Design: A review of the history of school food and nutrition policy, monitoring and evaluation efforts in the USA over the past three decades.

Setting: USA.

Subjects: School food service, school districts and schools nationwide.

Results: The school food environment in the USA is governed by a patchwork of federal, state and local laws and policies. The federal government has primary authority over the school meal programmes and has recently issued updated regulations governing the food and nutrient requirements for meals sold or served through the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. Competitive foods (i.e. foods and beverages sold/served outside the meal programmes) are governed primarily by state and district laws and policies, although new federal regulations are expected to set minimum standards in this area. The USA has a long history of data monitoring and evaluation funded by government and private foundations which has enabled decision makers to monitor progress and opportunities to improve the foods and beverages made available to students in school.

Conclusions: School food-related monitoring and evaluation research has been highly influential in influencing legislation and policy, leading to improvements in the foods and beverages available to children at school as part of planned meals and individual items sold outside the meal programmes. The lessons learned from the US experience provide insights that may be valuable for implementation, monitoring and evaluation of school food programmes in other countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, P.L. 79–396, Approved June 4, 1946. (60 Stat. 290).
    1. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2012) Program Information Report (Keydata), Internal Report. Alexandria, VA: USDA, Food and Nutrition Service.
    1. Musiker M (2009) On the map: National School Lunch Program feeds 30 million children. Amber Waves 7, 44.
    1. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2012) National Data Bank Public Use Database: SC2 (internal access only) (accessed March 2012).
    1. Wellisch JB & Jordan LA (1984) Sampling and data collection methods in the National Evaluation of School Nutrition Programs. Am J Clin Nutr 40, 2 Suppl., 368–381. - PubMed