Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04
- PMID: 23008301
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.9597
Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04
Erratum in
- J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):399
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the local recurrence (LR) rate between short-course (SC) and long-course (LC) neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Patients and methods: Eligible patients had ultrasound- or magnetic resonance imaging-staged T3N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from anal verge. SC consisted of pelvic radiotherapy 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, early surgery, and six courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. LC was 50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction, in 5.5 weeks, with continuous infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day, surgery in 4 to 6 weeks, and four courses of chemotherapy.
Results: Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomly assigned; 163 patients to SC and 163 to LC. Median potential follow-up time was 5.9 years (range, 3.0 to 7.8 years). Three-year LR rates (cumulative incidence) were 7.5% for SC and 4.4% for LC (difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, -2.1 to 8.3; P = .24). For distal tumors (< 5 cm), six of 48 SC patients and one of 31 LC patients experienced local recurrence (P = .21). Five-year distant recurrence rates were 27% for SC and 30% for LC (log-rank P = 0.92; hazard ratio [HR] for LC:SC, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.56). Overall survival rates at 5 years were 74% for SC and 70% for LC (log-rank P = 0.62; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.67). Late toxicity rates were not substantially different (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer G3-4: SC, 5.8%; LC, 8.2%; P = .53).
Conclusion: Three-year LR rates between SC and LC were not statistically significantly different; the CI for the difference is consistent with either no clinically important difference or differences in favor of LC. LC may be more effective in reducing LR for distal tumors. No differences in rates of distant recurrence, relapse-free survival, overall survival, or late toxicity were detected.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00145769.
Comment in
-
Short-course radiation versus long-course chemoradiation for rectal cancer: making progress.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3777-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0551. Epub 2012 Sep 24. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23008292 No abstract available.
-
[Local control in T3 rectal cancer : short-course radiotherapy versus chemoradiation].Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Feb;189(2):166-7. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0280-3. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013. PMID: 23229782 German. No abstract available.
-
But some neoadjuvant schedules are more equal than others.J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1799-800. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.7844. Epub 2013 Apr 1. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23547080 No abstract available.
-
Short-course preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3769. Epub 2013 Apr 1. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23547083 No abstract available.
-
Reply to K. Bujko and D. Tan et al.J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1800-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.3727. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23802244 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical