Cost-effectiveness of vaccination with a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Germany using a dynamic transmission model
- PMID: 23009387
- PMCID: PMC3575401
- DOI: 10.1186/2191-1991-2-19
Cost-effectiveness of vaccination with a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Germany using a dynamic transmission model
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent infections with human papillomavirus (HPV) are a necessary cause of cervical cancer and are responsible for important morbidity in men and women. Since 2007, HPV vaccination has been recommended and funded for all girls aged 12 to 17 in Germany. A previously published cost-effectiveness analysis, using a static model, showed that a quadrivalent HPV vaccination programme for 12-year-old girls in Germany would be cost effective. Here we present the results from a dynamic transmission model that can be used to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of different vaccination schemas.
Methods: We adapted a HPV dynamic transmission model, which has been used in other countries, to the German context. The model was used to compare a cervical cancer screening only strategy with a strategy of combining vaccination of females aged 12-17 years old and cervical cancer screening, based on the current recommendations in Germany. In addition, the impact of increasing vaccination coverage in this cohort of females aged 12-17 years old was evaluated in sensitivity analysis.
Results: The results from this analysis show that the current quadrivalent HPV vaccination programme of females ages 12 to 17 in Germany is cost-effective with an ICER of 5,525€/QALY (quality adjusted life year). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) increased to 10,293€/QALY when the vaccine effects on HPV6/11 diseases were excluded. At steady state, the model predicted that vaccinating girls aged 12 to 17 could reduce the number of HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical cancers by 65% and genital warts among women and men by 70% and 48%, respectively. The impact on HPV-related disease incidence and costs avoided would occur relatively soon after initiating the vaccine programme, with much of the early impact being due to the prevention of HPV6/11-related genital warts.
Conclusions: These results show that the current quadrivalent HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening programmes in Germany will substantially reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and genital warts. The evaluated vaccination strategies were all found to be cost-effective. Future analyses should include more HPV-related diseases.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Sep 4;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0080-9. eCollection 2017. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017. PMID: 28878573 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in Belgium.Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):231-45. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927030-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009. PMID: 19354343
-
Prophylaxis of cervical cancer and related cervical disease: a review of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against oncogenic HPV types.J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Apr;16(3):217-30. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.3.217. J Manag Care Pharm. 2010. PMID: 20331326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public health impact and cost effectiveness of routine and catch-up vaccination of girls and women with a nine-valent HPV vaccine in Japan: a model-based study.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05632-0. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33407188 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus vaccination in adolescence.Perspect Public Health. 2013 Nov;133(6):320-4. doi: 10.1177/1757913913499091. Epub 2013 Sep 4. Perspect Public Health. 2013. PMID: 24006173 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantifying the broader economic consequences of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Germany applying a government perspective framework.Health Econ Rev. 2015 Dec;5(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0054-6. Epub 2015 Jul 22. Health Econ Rev. 2015. PMID: 26198884 Free PMC article.
-
Loss of chance associated with sub-optimal HPV vaccination coverage rate in France.Papillomavirus Res. 2017 Jun;3:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Papillomavirus Res. 2017. PMID: 28720460 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodal Counseling Interventions: Effect on Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination Acceptance.Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Nov 6;5(4):86. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040086. Healthcare (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29113137 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Sep 4;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0080-9. eCollection 2017. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017. PMID: 28878573 Free PMC article.
-
Recovery from HPV vaccination deficits caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a modeling study of catch-up HPV vaccination among adolescent girls.Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 7;184(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05910-y. Eur J Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39644333 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baseman JG, Koutsky LA. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol. 2005;32(Suppl 1):S16–S24. - PubMed
-
- Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ, Steenbergen RD, van Duin M, Helmerhorst TJ, Snijders PJ. Human papillomavirus and the development of cervical cancer: concept of carcinogenesis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000;144:1671–1674. - PubMed
-
- Clifford GM, Rana RK, Franceschi S, Smith JS, Gough G, Pimenta JM. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in low-grade cervical lesions: comparison by geographic region and with cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1157–1164. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0812. - DOI - PubMed
-
- von Krogh G. Management of anogenital warts (condylomata acuminata) Eur J Dermatol. 2001;11:598–603. quiz 604. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources