Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;16(6):1006-11.
doi: 10.1017/S136898001200420X. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

School food cost-benefits: England

Affiliations

School food cost-benefits: England

Michael Nelson. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the costs per relevant unit (pupils and meals) associated with improvements to school food and the potential economic and health gains that may result.

Design: Calculation of costs per relevant unit (pupils and meals) based on (i) Department for Education expenditure to support improvements in school food, 2005–2011 and (ii) measures of the changes in the number of pupils taking school lunch and the number of meals served over the same time period; plus examples of the use of linked data to predict longer-term economic and health outcomes of healthier eating at school.

Setting: England.

Subjects: Local authorities, government departments and non-departmental public bodies.

Results: Analysis of investment over a 6-year period indicates that costs of setting up and maintaining a change organization such as the School Food Trust were low in relation to short-term benefits in nutrition and behaviour. Models that predict long-terms gains to the exchequer and to quality-adjusted life years need further elaboration.

Conclusions: Modest levels of government investment in the delivery and promotion of healthier school food is likely to yield both short-term and long-term benefits in relation to nutrition, learning, economics and health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nelson M, Nicholas J, Wood L et al. (2012) Seventh Annual Survey of Take Up of School Lunches in England 2011–2012. Sheffield: School Food Trust; available at http://www.schoolfoodtrust.org.uk/school-cooks-caterers/reports/seventh-...
    1. Department of Education and Employment (2007) Statutory Instrument 2007 No. 2359. The Education (Nutritional Standards and Requirements for School Food) (England) Regulations 2007. London: The Stationery Office; available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/pdf/uksi_20072359_en.pdf
    1. Department of Education and Employment (2008) Statutory Instrument 2008 No. 1800. The Education (Nutritional Standards and Requirements for School Food) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2359) as amended by the Education (Nutritional Standards and Requirements for School Food) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1800). London: The Stationery Office; available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/pdf/uksi_20081800_en.pdf
    1. Sassi F, Cecchini M, Lauer J et al. (2009) Improving Lifestyles, Tackling Obesity: The Health and Economic Impact of Prevention Strategies. OECD Health Working Papers no. 48. Paris: OECD.
    1. Jones LR, Steer CD, Rogers IS et al. (2010) Influences on child fruit and vegetable intake: sociodemographic, parental and child factors in a longitudinal cohort study. Public Health Nutr 13, 1122–1130. - PubMed