Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16443-8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118368109. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Combinatorics of distance-based tree inference

Affiliations

Combinatorics of distance-based tree inference

Fabio Pardi et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Several popular methods for phylogenetic inference (or hierarchical clustering) are based on a matrix of pairwise distances between taxa (or any kind of objects): The objective is to construct a tree with branch lengths so that the distances between the leaves in that tree are as close as possible to the input distances. If we hold the structure (topology) of the tree fixed, in some relevant cases (e.g., ordinary least squares) the optimal values for the branch lengths can be expressed using simple combinatorial formulae. Here we define a general form for these formulae and show that they all have two desirable properties: First, the common tree reconstruction approaches (least squares, minimum evolution), when used in combination with these formulae, are guaranteed to infer the correct tree when given enough data (consistency); second, the branch lengths of all the simple (nearest neighbor interchange) rearrangements of a tree can be calculated, optimally, in quadratic time in the size of the tree, thus allowing the efficient application of hill climbing heuristics. The study presented here is a continuation of that by Mihaescu and Pachter on branch length estimation [Mihaescu R, Pachter L (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13206-13211]. The focus here is on the inference of the tree itself and on providing a basis for novel algorithms to reconstruct trees from distances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Standard naming of clades and branches when (A) e is external, and (B) e is internal. (C) An NNI-neighbor (around e) of the tree in B.

References

    1. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2004. Chaps 13, 14.
    1. Yang Z. Computational Molecular Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ Press; 2006.
    1. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. - PubMed
    1. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2004. Chap 11.
    1. Roch S. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances. Science. 2010;327:1376–1379. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources