Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Feb;46(2):242-53.

Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs

Affiliations

Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs

N Risch. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

The results from the second paper of this series are reexamined for markers that are not completely polymorphic. A maximum lod score (MLS) criterion is defined for affected relative pairs. The expected MLS (EMLS) is calculated as a function of the marker polymorphic information content (PIC) for various values of lambda R (relative risk ratio) and different relative types by using simulations. An m-allele model with equal allele frequencies is employed. The EMLS is calculated for two sampling strategies: scheme 1, which uses pairs only, and scheme 2, which also includes additional informative relatives. For scheme 2, the percent of the maximum achievable EMLS (i.e., for a marker with a PIC of 1.0) is approximately equal to the marker PIC value for all relative types. For scheme 1, the EMLS is greatly diminished unless PIC is high, especially for distant relatives. For example, scheme 1 is not cost-effective for sibs unless PIC greater than .7; for second- and third-degree relatives, PIC must be greater than .85. Therefore, in general, it will be worthwhile to type additional relatives in linkage studies using affected pairs. The comparative value of sibs versus distant relatives depends on lambda R, recombination theta, and PIC. For large lambda R and PIC values, distant relatives are preferred. Alternatively, for smaller lambda R and PIC values, sibs are best.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Jul;39(1):148-50 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1955 Sep;7(3):277-318 - PubMed
    1. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):143-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314-31 - PubMed
    1. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(1):85-97 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources