Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;1(2):137-44.
doi: 10.1177/1941738108331197.

Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: a meta-analysis

Patrick Vavken  1 , Johannes Holinka, Jan Dirk Rompe, Ronald Dorotka
Affiliations

Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: a meta-analysis

Patrick Vavken et al. Sports Health. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Furthermore, a dose-response relationship was sought as a secondary confirmation of effectiveness.

Hypothesis: Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy has a high, dose-responsive effectiveness in the management of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.

Study design: Meta-analysis.

Methods: Studies were identified from online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register), manual searches, and personal communication with experts in the field. After assessment of heterogeneity, a random effects model was generated. The primary end points were identified as pain and function by using the visual analog scale and the Constant-Murley Score, respectively. These end points were pooled and the weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Odds ratios of the secondary end point deposit resorption were pooled.

Results: In 14 studies, shock wave therapy led to a significantly higher reduction of pain (weighted mean difference, -2.8 points; 95% confidence interval, -4.2 to -1.5 points) and improvement of function (weighted mean difference, 19.8 points; 95% confidence interval, 13.4-26.3 points), compared to other treatments and placebo. High-energy treatment produced significantly better results than low-energy treatment for pain reduction (weighted mean difference, 1.7 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.6 points) and improvement of function (weighted mean difference, 10.7 points; 95% confidence interval, 7.2-14.1 points). These results are consistent with a dose-response relationship supporting the effectiveness of shock wave therapy.

Conclusion: Shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder is effective in pain relief, function restoration, and deposit resorption; however, these conclusions are susceptible to bias arising from the limitations of the included studies.

Keywords: calcifying tendinitis; extracorporeal shock wave therapy; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flow of trials from searches to inclusion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albert JD, Meadeb J, Guggenbuhl P, et al. High-energy extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff: a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:335-341 - PubMed
    1. Buch M, Hahne H, Klatt J, Träger D, Siebert W. Ergebnisse der Stosswellentherapie bei der Tendinosis Calcarea der Schulter aus der Orthopädischen Klink Kassel. Orthop Prax. 1999;35:143-149
    1. Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Barile A, et al. Effectiveness of radial shock wave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: single-blind, randomized clinical study. Phys Ther. 2006;86:672-682 - PubMed
    1. Cosentino R, Stefano RD, Selvi E, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: single blind study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:248-250 - PMC - PubMed
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188 - PubMed