Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;1(3):242-6.
doi: 10.1177/1941738109334272.

Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: a clinical review

Affiliations

Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: a clinical review

Reed Ferber et al. Sports Health. 2009 May.

Abstract

Context: Various epidemiological studies have estimated that up to 70% of runners sustain an overuse running injury each year. Although few overuse running injuries have an established cause, more than 80% of running-related injuries occur at or below the knee, which suggests that some common mechanisms may be at work. The question then becomes, are there common mechanisms related to overuse running injuries?

Evidence acquisition: RESEARCH STUDIES WERE IDENTIFIED VIA THE FOLLOWING ELECTRONIC DATABASES: MEDLINE, EMBASE PsycInfo, and CINAHL (1980-July 2008). Inclusion was based on evaluation of risk factors for overuse running injuries.

Results: A majority of the risk factors that have been researched over the past few years can be generally categorized into 2 groups: atypical foot pronation mechanics and inadequate hip muscle stabilization.

Conclusion: Based on the review of literature, there is no definitive link between atypical foot mechanics and running injury mechanisms. The lack of normative data and a definition of typical foot structure has hampered progress. In contrast, a large and growing body of literature suggests that weakness of hip-stabilizing muscles leads to atypical lower extremity mechanics and increased forces within the lower extremity while running.

Keywords: cause; injuries; prevention; running.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Right, markings to bisect the long axis of the shank and rearfoot; left, goniometric measurement of standing rearfoot-shank angle (left foot shown).

References

    1. Benas D. Special considerations in women’s rehabilitation programs. In: Hunter LY, Funk FJ, eds. Rehabilitation of the Injured Knee. Princeton, NJ: Mosby Co; 1984:393-405
    1. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Koplan JP, Shirley RW, Campbell CC, Sikes RK. The incidence of injuries and hazards in recreational and fitness runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:113-114
    1. Cheung RT, Ng GY. Efficacy of motion control shoes for reducing excessive rearfoot motion in fatigued runners. Phys Ther Sport. 2007;8:75-81
    1. Cichanowski HR, Schmitt JS, Johnson RJ, Niemuth PE. Hip strength in collegiate female athletes with patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1227-1232 - PubMed
    1. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15:376-381 - PubMed