Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;38(1):1472-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

Understanding treatment-seeking smokers' motivation to change: content analysis of the decisional balance worksheet

Affiliations

Understanding treatment-seeking smokers' motivation to change: content analysis of the decisional balance worksheet

Susan E Collins et al. Addict Behav. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

The Decisional Balance Worksheet (DBW), an open-ended measure of motivation to change, may be used to record the pros and cons of smoking versus abstinence among treatment-seeking smokers. Recent findings indicated that the open-ended DBW could be quantified to validly reflect people's level of motivation to stop smoking (Collins, Eck, Torchalla, Schröter, & Batra, 2010). The goal of the current study was to enhance our understanding of these participants' motivation to change by examining the qualitative content of their decisional balance. Participants were treatment-seeking smokers (N=268) who had participated in a larger randomized controlled trial of tailored smoking cessation interventions (Batra et al., 2010). Using the DBW, participants recorded their pros and cons of smoking versus abstinence, and content analysis methods were used to extract common themes. Findings indicated that the physical and psychological effects/functions of smoking and abstinence were most commonly mentioned as both pros and cons. Although the decisional balance categories were substantively similar over time, their relative frequency shifted from pre- to posttreatment. For the sample as a whole, the number of pros of smoking generally decreased, whereas the pros of abstinence increased from pre- to posttreatment. Findings suggest that clinicians can expect certain perceived pros and cons to characterize their clients' decision-making process about smoking and abstinence. At the same time, the use of the decisional balance allows for assessment of individuals' unique motivational set.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histograms showing the distributions of the overall category counts (number of pros and cons of smoking and abstinence, respectively) at pretreatment versus posttreatment.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Histograms showing the distributions of the overall category counts (number of pros and cons of smoking and abstinence, respectively) at pretreatment versus posttreatment.

References

    1. Abrams DB, Herzog TA, Emmons KM, Linnan L. Stages of change versus addiction: a replication and extension. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2000;2:223–229. doi: 10.1080/1462220005014748. - PubMed
    1. Batra A, Collins SE, Schröter M, Eck S, Torchalla I, Buchkremer G. A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of smoking cessation modified for at-risk smoker subgroups. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2010;38:128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.08.003. - PubMed
    1. Batra A, Collins SE, Torchalla I, Schröter M, Buchkremer G. Multidimensional smoker profiles and their prediction of smoking following a pharmacobehavioral intervention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2008;35:41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.08.006. - PubMed
    1. Biener L, Abrams DB. The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychology. 1991;10:360–365. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.360. - PubMed
    1. Borland R, Yong H-H, Balmford J, Cooper J, Cummings KM, O’Connor RJ, Fong GT. Motivational factors predict quit attempts but not maintenance of smoking cessation: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Project. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2010;12:S4–S11. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq050. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types