Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;33(18):2875-83.
doi: 10.1002/elps.201200255.

Electrophoretic separations in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchips using mixtures of ionic, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants

Affiliations

Electrophoretic separations in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchips using mixtures of ionic, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants

Qian Guan et al. Electrophoresis. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

The use of surfactant mixtures to affect both EOF and separation selectivity in electrophoresis with PDMS substrates is reported, and capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection is introduced for EOF measurement on PDMS microchips. First, the EOF was measured for two nonionic surfactants (Tween 20 and Triton X-100), mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant systems (SDS/Tween 20 and SDS/Triton X-100), and finally for the first time, mixed zwitterionic/nonionic surfactant systems (TDAPS/Tween 20 and TDAPS/Triton X-100). EOF for the nonionic surfactants decreased with increasing surfactant concentration. The addition of SDS or TDAPS to a nonionic surfactant increased EOF. After establishing the EOF behavior, the separation of model catecholamines was explored to show the impact on separations. Similar analyte resolution with greater peak heights was achieved with mixed surfactant systems containing Tween 20 and TDAPS relative to the single surfactant system. Finally, the detection of catecholamine release from PC12 cells by stimulation with 80 mM K(+) was performed to demonstrate the usefulness of mixed surfactant systems to provide resolution of biological compounds in complex samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EOF measurements using both current monitoring and C4D methods. The mark* denotes the time point at which the polarity is reversed. Field strength: 200 V/cm; BGEs: 20 mM and 18 mM TES buffer, pH 7.0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EOF as a function of concentration for Tween 20 and Triton X-100 in boric acid buffer (20 mM and 18 mM) at pH 9.2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EOF as a function of SDS concentration using (A) Tween 20 and (B) Triton X-100 in boric acid buffer (20 mM and 18 mM) at pH 9.2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EOF as a function of TDAPS concentration using (A) Tween 20 and (B) Triton X-100 in boric acid buffer (20 mM and 18 mM) at pH 9.2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example electropherograms for 20 µM DA, NE, E and 40 µM CA and L-DOPA in 20 mM TES buffer at pH 7.0 as a function of surfactant composition. Field strength: 150 V/cm; 10-s hydrodynamic injection; Detection: DC Amp, Edet = 1.2 V.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Electropherograms of catecholamine release from PC12 cells by stimulation with 80 mM K+ in 2× diluted sample and with the standard solution containing 5 µM DA, NE, E and 10 µM CA and L-DOPA. BGE: 20 mM TES, 0.5 mM Tween 20, 4 mM TDAPS, pH 7.0; Field strength: 150 V/cm; 10-s Hydrodynamic injection; Detection: DC Amp., Edet = 1.2 V.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reyes DR, Iossifidis D, Auroux PA, Manz A. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:2623–2636. - PubMed
    1. Auroux PA, Iossifidis D, Reyes DR, Manz A. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:2637–2652. - PubMed
    1. Vandaveer WR, Pasas SA, Martin RS, Lunte SM. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:3667–3677. - PubMed
    1. Vickers JA, Dressen BM, Weston MC, Boonsong K, Chailapakul O, Cropek DM, Henry CS. Electrophoresis. 2007;28:1123–1129. - PubMed
    1. Vickers JA, Caulum MM, Henry CS. Analytical Chemistry. 2006;78:7446–7452. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources