Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;41(4):413-8.
doi: 10.1002/uog.12316.

Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study

W A Hassan et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To describe a two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound technique to measure cervical dilatation in labor, and to compare ultrasound with digital measurements.

Methods: 2D transperineal ultrasound was performed in 21 nulliparous women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation and cervical dilatation measured before or after a digital vaginal examination. The absolute difference was calculated and Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the mean difference between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound examination of cervical dilatation. Pearson analysis was used to determine the correlation between digital and ultrasound measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% CI were used to evaluate the reliability of the two methods.

Results: Satisfactory quality images of the cervix were obtained in 19 of 21 cases. There was positive correlation between 2D ultrasound measurement of cervical dilatation and digital vaginal examination (Pearson coefficient r = 0.821, n = 19, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference between digital and ultrasound measurements of 0.08 cm (95% limits of agreement: -1.83 to 2.00) and the mean absolute difference was 1.24 cm. The ICC between the two methods was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-0.92).

Conclusions: Assessment and measurement of cervical dilatation by 2D transperineal ultrasound is feasible, with close agreement shown between the technique and digital vaginal examination. The technique that we describe could represent an important component of a 'sonopartogram' for ultrasound assessment of labor progress.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources