Hysterectomy…..Which route?
- PMID: 23024529
- PMCID: PMC3257329
- DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0076-x
Hysterectomy…..Which route?
Abstract
Objective: We designed this study to focus on women with mobile uteri benign no larger than 14 weeks, who would ordinarily be considered candidates for vaginal hysterectomy and compare the outcomes when abdominal routes were chosen. We also compared the intra and post operative complications, requirement for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, between abdominal and vaginal route of hysterectomy.
Method: In a simple randomized prospective comparative study 200 consecutive patients requiring hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions were analysed over a period of 2 years. (June 2006-May 2008). Group A (n = 100) underwent vaginal hysterectomy (non descent vaginal hysterectomy, NDVH) which was compared with group B (n = 100) who had abdominal hysterectomy.
Results: As far as duration of operation, duration of i.v. drip, mobilization in post operative ward, duration of hospital stay, P value was significant. Regarding blood loss P value was insignificant.
Conclusion: The accessibility of the vaginal passage, disease confined to the uterus and the surgeons experience are the major determining factors for the choice of the route of hysterectomy.
Keywords: Hysterectomy; Non descent vaginal hysterectomy.
References
-
- ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:929–30. - PubMed
-
- Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:841–848. - PubMed
-
- Wingo PA, Huezo CM, Rubin GL, et al. The mortality risk associated with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152:803–808. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials