Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;17(4):457-477.
doi: 10.1037/a0029372. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions

Affiliations

Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions

Inbal Nahum-Shani et al. Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

In recent years, research in the area of intervention development has been shifting from the traditional fixed-intervention approach to adaptive interventions, which allow greater individualization and adaptation of intervention options (i.e., intervention type and/or dosage) over time. Adaptive interventions are operationalized via a sequence of decision rules that specify how intervention options should be adapted to an individual's characteristics and changing needs, with the general aim to optimize the long-term effectiveness of the intervention. Here, we review adaptive interventions, discussing the potential contribution of this concept to research in the behavioral and social sciences. We then propose the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), an experimental design useful for addressing research questions that inform the construction of high-quality adaptive interventions. To clarify the SMART approach and its advantages, we compare SMART with other experimental approaches. We also provide methods for analyzing data from SMART to address primary research questions that inform the construction of a high-quality adaptive intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for ADHD study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial with no embedded tailoring variables.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial design in which participants are re-randomized to different second-stage intervention options depending on an intermediate outcome (e.g., response/non-response).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial design in which whether to re-randomize depends on an intermediate outcome and prior treatment.

References

    1. Abele AE, Wiese BS. The nomological network of self-management strategies and career success. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2008;81:733–749.
    1. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioural sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 1–34.
    1. Barlas Y, Yasarcan H. Goal setting, evaluation, learning and revision: A dynamic modeling approach. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2006;29(1):79–87.
    1. Beck JS, Liese BS, Najavits LM. Cognitive therapy. In: Frances RJ, Miller SI, Mack A, editors. Clinical textbook of addictive disorders. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005. pp. 474–501.
    1. Bierman KL, Nix RL, Maples JJ, Murphy SA. Examining clinical judgment in an adaptive intervention design: The Fast Track Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2006;74:468–481. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms