Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;44(9):637-45.

Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists

Cynthia C Harper  1 , Jillian T Henderson, Tina R Raine, Suzan Goodman, Philip D Darney, Kirsten M Thompson, Christine Dehlendorf, J Joseph Speidel
Affiliations

Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists

Cynthia C Harper et al. Fam Med. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists provide much of contraceptive care in the United States and have a shared goal in preventing unintended pregnancy among patients. We assessed their competency to offer women contraceptives of the highest efficacy levels.

Methods: We conducted a national probability survey of family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists (n=1,192). We measured counseling and provision practices of intrauterine contraception and used multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the importance of evidence-based knowledge to contraceptive care.

Results: Family physicians reported seeing fewer contraceptive patients per week than did obstetrician-gynecologists and were less likely to report sufficient time for counseling. While 95% of family physicians believed patients were receptive to learning about intrauterine contraception, fewer than half offered counseling or the method. Only half were trained to competence to offer intrauterine contraception, while virtually all obstetrician-gynecologists were. Both family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists were unlikely to have adequate knowledge of the women who would be good candidates for intrauterine contraception-as gauged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraception-and consequently did not offer the method to a wide range of eligible patients.

Conclusions: Most family physicians providing contraceptive care were not offering methods with top-tier effectiveness, although they reported interest in updating contraceptive skills through training. Obstetrician-gynecologists had technical skills to offer intrauterine contraception but still required education on patient selection. Greater hands-on training opportunities for family physicians, and complementary education on eligible method candidates for obstetrician-gynecologists, can increase access to intrauterine contraception by women seeking contraceptive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of Physicians Who Would Consider Intrauterine Contraception for the Following Patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–6. - PubMed
    1. Scholle SH, Chang JC, Harman J, McNeil M. Trends in women's health services by type of physician seen. Women's Health Issues. 2002;12:165–77. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . Clinical preventive services for women: closing the gaps. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: Jul 19, 2011.
    1. World Health Organization. Comparing typical effectiveness of contraceptive methods. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2006
    1. Trussell J. The essential of contraception: efficacy, safety, and personal consideration. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D, editors. Contraceptive Technology. 19th edition Ardent Media; New York: 2007. pp. 19–47.