Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012;17 Suppl 3(0 3):252-64.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.713441.

Literacy barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community clinics

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Literacy barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community clinics

Connie L Arnold et al. J Health Commun. 2012.

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between literacy and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening knowledge, beliefs, and experiences, with a focus on fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). Participants were 975 patients in 8 Louisiana federally qualified health centers. Participants were 50 years of age or older and not up to date with CRC screening; approximately half (52%) had low literacy (less than a 9th-grade level). Participants with low literacy were less likely than were those with adequate literacy to be aware of advertisements promoting CRC screening (58.7% vs. 76.3%, p < .0001) or to believe it was very helpful to find CRC early (74.5% vs. 91.9%, p < .0001). The majority of participants had positive beliefs about the benefits of CRC screening using FOBTs. Participants with low literacy had more perceived barriers to FOBT completion and were more likely to strongly agree or agree that FOBTs would be confusing, embarrassing, or a lot of trouble; however, none of these remained significant in multivariate analyses controlling for relevant covariates. Confidence in being able to obtain an FOBT kit was high among those with low and adequate literacy (89.8% vs. 93.1%, respectively, p = .20); yet multivariate analyses revealed a significant difference in regard to literacy (p = .04) with low-literacy participants indicating less confidence. There was no significant difference by literacy in ever receiving a physician recommendation for CRC screening (38.4% low vs. 39.0% adequate, p = .79); however, multivariate analyses revealed significant differences in FOBT completion by literacy (p = .036). Overall, findings suggest that literacy is a factor in patients' CRC knowledge, beliefs, and confidence in obtaining a FOBT.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer facts & figures 2011. Author; Atlanta, GA: 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/docume....
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior. 2004;31:143–164. - PubMed
    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Viera A, Crotty K, Viswanath M. Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD: 2011. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011a;60 Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6001.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011b;60:884–886. - PubMed

Publication types