Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 2:12:19.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-19.

Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy

Rannie Rabe  1 , Clarence Pio Rey Yacapin, Brian S Buckley, Jose Macario Faylona
Affiliations

Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy

Rannie Rabe et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide range of mesh sizes are available for use in hernia repair, in low-resource health care settings the provision of multiple products may not be supportable and it may be necessary for the provision and use of a single mesh size. This study aimed to determine whether the recommended 7.0 cm x 15.0 cm size is an appropriate single mesh size.

Methods: In order to determine the optimal mesh size according to recommended surgical practices, in vivo measurements of key dimensions of the inguinal floor were taken in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy.

Results: Measurements were taken in 43 patients: 40 men and 3 women, mean age 43 years (SD 13.6); 39 with indirect hernias, 4 with direct. Allowing for recommended mesh overlaps, the optimal mesh size for provision to be appropriate for the majority of patients was determined to be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm, 21% wider than the mesh size currently recommended for use in Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy.

Conclusions: An appropriate size for routine provision in low-resource settings, or other settings where the provision of several mesh sizes is not supportable, may be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the inguinal canal, landmarks and points of measurements.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ. 2008;336:269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awad SS, Fagan SP. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2004;188(6A Suppl):9S–16S. - PubMed
    1. Fitzgibbons R. Management of an inguinal hernia: Conventional? Tension-free? Laparoscopic? Or maybe no treatment at all (Abstract) J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(4 Suppl):S1–S99. - PubMed
    1. Sakorafas G, Halikias I, Nissotakis C, Kotsifopoulos N, Stavrou A, Antonopoulos C, Kassaras G. Open tension free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique. BMC Surg. 2001;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-1-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;4 CD002197. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources