Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Oct 3:12:348.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-348.

The short-term effect on alliance and satisfaction of using patient feedback scales in mental health out-patient treatment. A randomised controlled trial

Marit By Rise  1 , Lasse Eriksen, Hilde Grimstad, Aslak Steinsbekk
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The short-term effect on alliance and satisfaction of using patient feedback scales in mental health out-patient treatment. A randomised controlled trial

Marit By Rise et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The main aim was to investigate the effect of using two brief feedback scales in mental health out-patient treatment six weeks after starting treatment, compared to treatment as usual. Hypotheses were that use of feedback scales would improve treatment alliance and patient satisfaction.

Methods: An open parallel-group randomised controlled trial was conducted in an out-patient unit in a mental health hospital in Central Norway. Eight therapists trained in using the feedback scales in the Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) treated the intervention group. Seventeen therapists treated the controls, providing treatment without using feedback scales. The main outcome measures were treatment alliance and patient satisfaction.

Results: Seventy-five patients participated. There were no differences between the groups in the intention to treat (ITT) analyses on alliance (mean difference = 0.08, 95% CI -0.44, 0.59, p = 0.760) or satisfaction (mean difference = 0.24, 95% CI -1.85, 2.32, p = 0.819), and no statistically significant differences between the groups in the per protocol (PP, n = 58) analyses on alliance (mean difference = 0.32, 95% CI -0.84, 3.16, p = 0.137) or satisfaction (mean difference = 1.16, 95% CI -0.84, 3.16, p = 0.248) six weeks after the treatment started. The effect size in favour of the PCOMS group increased from 0.07 for alliance and 0.06 for satisfaction in the intention to treat analysis to 0.40 on alliance and 0.31 for satisfaction in the per protocol analysis. Among the other outcomes, the PCOMS group had better motivation for treatment (estimated mean difference ITT: 0.29, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.57, p = 0.05, PP: 0.28, 95% CI 0.04, 0.52, p = 0.024).

Conclusion: Six weeks after starting treatment, there were no effects on alliance and satisfaction from using two brief feedback scales. Since the per protocol analyses showed higher effect sizes, future investigations in a larger study with longer follow-up are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan SE, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:53–62. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. May C, Montori VM, Mair FS. We need minimally disruptive medicine. BMJ. 2009;339:b2803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N. et al.Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cegala DJ, Street RL Jr, Clinch CR. The impact of patient participation on physicians' information provision during a primary care medical interview. Health Commun. 2007;21:177–185. doi: 10.1080/10410230701307824. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types