Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 3;2(5):e001117.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001117. Print 2012.

Utility of the new rheumatoid arthritis 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in routine clinical care

Affiliations

Utility of the new rheumatoid arthritis 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in routine clinical care

Lauren Kennish et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The new 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been designed to classify early onset RA, but has not been studied to identify RA in patients with arthritis seen in routine clinical care where correct 'classification' of patients, when they are not selected for having RA would be important.

Design: Prospective, consecutive patients cohort.

Setting: Outpatient clinic of a university rheumatology centre.

Participants: A total of 126 patients with joint symptoms were consecutively recruited.

Interventions: The ACR/EULAR RA criteria were applied, with questions followed by a targeted musculoskeletal exam. The gold standard for the diagnosis of RA was the primary rheumatologist's diagnosis.

Primary outcome measure: Number of patients with non-RA diagnosis who were classified as having RA by the new classification criteria.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the 2010 criteria in classifying RA were 97% and 55%, respectively, compared with the 1987 RA criteria which were 93% and 76%, respectively. The 2010 criteria as applied to this group of patients had a poorer positive predictive (44% vs 61%) and a similar negative predictive value (98% vs 97%) compared with the 1987 criteria. More specifically, 66.7% of systemic lupus erythematosus patients, 50% of osteoarthritis, 37.5% of psoriatic arthritis and 27.2% of others fulfilled the new criteria and could have been classified as RA.

Conclusions: In this, we believe, the first study to examine the new 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria among consecutive patients seen in routine care, we found the criteria to have low specificity, and therefore incorrectly label those as having RA when, in fact, they may have a different type of inflammatory arthritis. Physicians need to be aware of this when applying the new criteria for classifying their patients for any purpose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver–operator characteristic curves of ACR/EULAR RA criteria predicting MD diagnosis of ‘rheumatoid arthritis’.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Firestein G. Rheumatoid arthritis—etiology and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Firestein GS, Budd RC, Harris ED, McInnes IB, Ruddy S, Sergent JS. eds. Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. 8th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2009
    1. Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, et al. Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:263–9 - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:964–75 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24 - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, Liang MH. Classification criteria revisited. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1228–30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources