Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Nov;73(6):911-9.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.911.

Costs of alcohol screening and brief intervention in medical settings: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Costs of alcohol screening and brief intervention in medical settings: a review of the literature

Jeremy W Bray et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: This article summarizes the literature on the implementation costs of alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) in medical settings.

Method: Electronic databases were searched using SBI- and cost-related terms. Methodological approaches and cost estimates were abstracted from each study and categorized based on the cost methodology. Costs were updated to 2009 U.S. dollars. To determine a summary cost measure, we excluded outliers and computed the median of the remaining cost estimates.

Results: Seventeen studies with cost estimates were identified for further study. Costs ranged from $0.51 to $601.50 per screen and from $3.41 to $243.01 per brief intervention (BI). Cost estimates were lower when an activity-based cost methodology was used, in primary care settings, and when the provider was not a doctor. The median summary cost of a screen is approximately $4, and the median summary cost of a BI is approximately $48.

Conclusions: Screening cost estimates had more variation than BI cost estimates. Provider type and service delivery time drive the cost variation. Interpretation of cost differences was limited by insufficient reporting of the cost methodology. Cost estimates presented here are similar in size to the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System and Current Procedural Terminology reimbursement amounts, suggesting that insurance-based service reimbursement may be sufficient to sustain alcohol SBI in practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aalto M, Pekuri P, Seppä K. Obstacles to carrying out brief intervention for heavy drinkers in primary health care: A focus group study. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2003;22:169–173. - PubMed
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC. Brief intervention—for hazardous and harmful drinking: A manual for use in primary care. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Dauser D, Burleson JA, Zarkin GA, Bray JW. Brief interventions for at-risk drinking: Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness in managed care organizations. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2006;41:624–631. - PubMed
    1. Babor TF, McRee BG, Kassebaum PA, Grimaldi PL, Ahmed K, Bray J. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Substance Abuse. 2007;28:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Ballesteros J, Duffy JC, Querejeta I, Ariño J, González-Pinto A. Efficacy of brief interventions for hazardous drinkers in primary care: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2004;28:608–618. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms