Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 16;287(47):39824-33.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.393504. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

Poly(ADP-ribose) contributes to an association between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A in nucleotide excision repair

Affiliations

Poly(ADP-ribose) contributes to an association between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A in nucleotide excision repair

Brenee S King et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) promotes the formation of UVR-induced, DNA helix distorting photolesions such as (6-4) pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Effective repair of such lesions by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is required to prevent DNA mutations and chromosome aberrations. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a zinc finger protein with well documented involvement in base excision repair. PARP-1 is activated in response to DNA damage and catalyzes the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) subunits that assist in the assembly of DNA repair proteins at sites of damage. In this study, we present evidence for PARP-1 contributions to NER, extending the knowledge of PARP-1 function in DNA repair beyond the established role in base excision repair. Silencing the PARP-1 protein or inhibiting PARP activity leads to retention of UVR-induced photolesions. PARP activation following UVR exposure promotes association between PARP-1 and XPA, a central protein in NER. Administration of PARP inhibitors confirms that poly(ADP-ribose) facilitates PARP-1 association with XPA in whole cell extracts, in isolated chromatin complexes, and in vitro. Furthermore, inhibition of PARP activity decreases UVR-stimulated XPA chromatin association, illustrating that these relationships occur in a meaningful context for NER. These results provide a mechanistic link for PARP activity in the repair of UVR-induced photoproducts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Effects of PARP activity on retention of UVR-induced photoproducts. A, representative Western blot comparing PARP-1 protein in HaCaT and PARP-1 HuSH cells. GAPDH is used as a loading control. B, quantification of A by densitometry. PARP-1 intensity was normalized to GAPDH. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. C, quantification of PAR Western blots by densitometry in HaCaT and PARP-1 HuSH cells following UVR exposure. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. NT = not treated. D, HaCaT cells and PARP-1 HuSH cells were exposed to a single dose of ssUVR (3 kJ/m2) and collected at various times postexposure. Immunofluorescence was used to obtain images of 6-4 PPs. Initial UVR-induced photoproducts did not differ between HaCaT and PARP-1 HuSH cells. E, fluorescence intensity obtained from images in D. Open triangles, HaCaT; closed circles, PARP-1 HuSH. Intensities were normalized to NT sample. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 4. F and G, slot blot was performed on DNA extracted from HaCaT and PARP-1 HuSH cells. Quantification of lesion intensity was done by densitometry. The intensities were normalized to NT. F, intensity of 6-4 PPs formation. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. G, intensity of CPD formation. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Scale bar, 50 μm.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Inhibition of PARP activity results in retention of UVR-induced lesions. HaCaT cells were pre-exposed to a PARP inhibitor, DPQ, 30 min prior to a single dose of ssUVR (3 kJ/m2) or exposed to UVR alone and collected at the indicated times postexposure. A, quantification of PAR Western blots by densitometry. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. B, quantification of 6-4 PPs obtained from immunofluorescent images. UV only samples (open triangles) and DPQ+UV samples (closed circles). Fluorescence intensity was normalized to untreated (NT) sample. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 4. C, quantification of CPDs obtained from immunofluorescent images. Fluorescence intensity of raw data is shown. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.01.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
UVR-induced association between XPA and PARP-1. HaCaT cells were exposed to a single dose of ssUVR (3 kJ/m2) and collected at the indicated times postexposure. A, representative image of co-immunoprecipitation. XPA was immunoprecipitated (IP) from cells, and the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted (IB) for PAR. The membranes were stripped and immunoblotted for XPA, as confirmation for immunoprecipitation, n = 3. B, representative image of co-immunoprecipitation. XPA was immunoprecipitated from cells, and the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted for PARP-1. The membranes were stripped and immunoblotted for XPA, as confirmation for immunoprecipitation, n = 3. C, dual staining with antibodies against XPA (red) and PARP-1 (green) was performed to assess the amount of co-localization (merge, yellow). D, quantification of intensities from C. The percentage of co-localization was determined as stated under “Experimental Procedures.” The intensities were normalized to the untreated (NT) sample. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. **, p < 0.01. Scale bar, 10 μm.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
UVR-induced association between XPA and chromatin bound PARP-1. HEK 293 cells were exposed to a single dose of ssUVR (3 kJ/m2) and collected at the indicated times postexposure. A modified chromatin immunoprecipitation method (ChIP-on-Western) was then performed. A, representative image of co-immunoprecipitation. PARP-1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from cells, and the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted (IB) for XPA. The membranes were stripped and immunoblotted for PARP-1, as confirmation for immunoprecipitation. B, quantification of Western blot by densitometry. NT, untreated. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 5. *, p < 0.05.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Silencing PARP-1 protein leads to decreased association between PARP-1 and XPA. Co-immunoprecipitations were performed in HaCaT and PARP-1 HuSH cells. A, representative image of co-immunoprecipitations. PARP-1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from cells, and the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted (IB) for PARP-1, PAR, and XPA. B, representative image of reciprocal co-immunoprecipitations. XPA was immunoprecipitated from cells, and the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted for PARP-1, PAR, and XPA.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Inhibition of PARP-1 activity leads to decreased association between PARP-1 and XPA. HaCaT cells were pre-exposed to a PARP inhibitor, DPQ, 30 min prior to UVR exposure. A, cells were collected 30 min post-UVR. Representative Western blot obtained from modified chromatin immunoprecipitation method (ChIP-on-Western). PARP-1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from chromatin complexes. The membranes were immunoblotted (IB) for XPA and subsequently immunoblotted for PARP-1 as confirmation for immunoprecipitation. B, quantification of Western blot by densitometry. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. C, HaCaT cells were pre-exposed to a PARP inhibitor, DPQ, 30 min prior to UVR exposure and cells were fixed 1 h post-UVR. Dual staining with antibodies against XPA (red) and PARP-1 (green) was performed to assess the amount of co-localization (merge, yellow). D, graph representing co-localization between XPA and PARP-1. The percentage of co-localization was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 3. E, purified PARP-1 and His-XPA were incubated alone (lane 7), with activated PARP-1 (addition of activated DNA and NAD+, lane 8), or in the presence of the PARP inhibitor AG-014699 (lane 9). Following the various treatments, His-XPA was pulled down (IP) from each sample using cobalt-conjugated magnetic beads. Following pulldown, the membranes were subsequently immunoblotted (IB) for PARP-1, XPA, and PAR, NT=untreated. n = 3. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. Scale bar, 10 μm.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
Inhibition of PARP activity affects XPA function. HEK 293 cells were pre-exposed to a PARP inhibitor, DPQ, 30 min prior to UVR exposure and collected 5 min postexposure. A, representative Western blot obtained from modified chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-on-Western). XPA was immunoprecipitated (IP) from samples, and its ability to bind chromatin was assessed by subsequent immunoblotting (IB). B, quantification by densitometry from ChIP-on-Westerns. XPA intensity was normalized to NT. The data are presented as the means ± S.E., n = 4.; **, p < 0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Narayanan D. L., Saladi R. N., Fox J. L. (2010) Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int. J. Dermatol. 49, 978–986 - PubMed
    1. Park C. J., Choi B. S. (2006) The protein shuffle. Sequential interactions among components of the human nucleotide excision repair pathway. FEBS J. 273, 1600–1608 - PubMed
    1. Nouspikel T. (2009) DNA repair in mammalian cells. Nucleotide excision repair. Variations on versatility. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 66, 994–1009 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfeifer G. P., You Y. H., Besaratinia A. (2005) Mutations induced by ultraviolet light. Mutat. Res. 571, 19–31 - PubMed
    1. Sinha R. P., Häder D. P. (2002) UV-induced DNA damage and repair. A review. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 1, 225–236 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources