Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;34(4):735-9.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3300. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

Neuroradiology critical findings lists: survey of neuroradiology training programs

L S Babiarz  1 , S Trotter, V G Viertel, P Nagy, J S Lewin, D M Yousem
Affiliations

Neuroradiology critical findings lists: survey of neuroradiology training programs

L S Babiarz et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Joint Commission has identified timely reporting of critical results as one of the National Patient Safety Goals. We surveyed directors of neuroradiology fellowships to assess and compare critical findings lists across programs.

Materials and methods: A 3-question survey was e-mailed to directors of neuroradiology fellowships with the following questions: 1) Do you currently have a "critical findings" list that you abide by in your neuroradiology division? 2) How is that list distributed to your residents and fellows for implementation, if at all? and 3) Was this list vetted by neurology, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology departments? Programs with CF lists were asked for a copy of the list. Summary and comparative statistics were calculated.

Results: Fifty-one of 89 (57.3%) programs responded. Twenty-one of 51 (41.2%) programs had CF lists. Lists were distributed during orientation, sent via Web sites and e-mails, and posted in work areas. Eleven of 21 lists were developed internally, and 5 of 21, with the input from other departments. The origin of 5 of 21 lists was unknown. Forty CF entities were seen in 20 submitted lists (mean, 9.1; range, 2-23). The most frequent entities were the following: cerebral hemorrhage (18 of 20 lists), acute stroke (15 of 20), spinal cord compression (15 of 20), brain herniation (12 of 20), and spinal fracture/instability (12 of 20). Programs with no CF lists called clinicians on the basis of "common sense" and "clinical judgment."

Conclusions: Less than a half (41.2%) of directors of neuroradiology fellowships that responded have implemented CF lists. CF lists have variable length and content and are predominantly developed by radiology departments without external input.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Three-question survey e-mailed to neuroradiology fellowship program directors.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Neuroradiology fellowship program directors' responses to the e-mail-based survey concerning critical findings lists used in neuroradiology.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds, for the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999 - PubMed
    1. Thrall JH. Quality and safety revolution in health care. Radiology 2004;233:3–6 - PubMed
    1. Choksi VR, Marn C, Piotrowski MM, et al. . Illustrating the root-cause-analysis process: creation of a safety net with a semiautomated process for the notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:768–76 - PubMed
    1. Johnson CD, Miranda R, Aakre KT, et al. . Process improvement: what is it, why is it important, and how is it done? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:461–68 - PubMed
    1. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, et al. . Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:533–40 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources