Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;35(12):2464-71.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

Insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year, randomized, treat-to-target trial (BEGIN Once Long)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year, randomized, treat-to-target trial (BEGIN Once Long)

Bernard Zinman et al. Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To compare ultra-long-acting insulin degludec with glargine for efficacy and safety in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).

Research design and methods: In this 1-year, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial, adults with type 2 diabetes with A1C of 7-10% taking OADs were randomized 3:1 to receive once daily degludec or glargine, both with metformin. Insulin was titrated to achieve prebreakfast plasma glucose (PG) of 3.9-4.9 mmol/L. The primary end point was confirmation of noninferiority of degludec to glargine in A1C reduction after 52 weeks in an intent-to-treat analysis.

Results: In all, 1,030 participants (mean age 59 years; baseline A1C 8.2%) were randomized (degludec 773, glargine 257). Reduction in A1C with degludec was similar (noninferior) to that with glargine (1.06 vs. 1.19%), with an estimated treatment difference of degludec to glargine of 0.09% (95% CI -0.04 to 0.22). Overall rates of confirmed hypoglycemia (PG <3.1 mmol/L or severe episodes requiring assistance) were similar, with degludec and glargine at 1.52 versus 1.85 episodes/patient-year of exposure (PYE). There were few episodes of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia in the overall population, and these occurred at a lower rate with degludec versus glargine (0.25 vs. 0.39 episodes/PYE; P = 0.038). Similar percentages of patients in both groups achieved A1C levels <7% without hypoglycemia. End-of-trial mean daily insulin doses were 0.59 and 0.60 units/kg for degludec and glargine, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar.

Conclusions: Insulins degludec and glargine administered once daily in combination with OADs provided similar long-term glycemic control in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes, with lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia with degludec.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00765817.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glycemic efficacy. A: Mean A1C with time. B: Mean fasting PG with time. C: Nine-point profiles of SMBG at baseline (week 0) and after 52 weeks. Data for the first seven points are obtained on one day and data for the remaining two points are drawn from the next day. Data are reported as the mean ± SEM. Missing data after baseline were imputed with the last observation carried forward approach. Ideg, insulin degludec; IGlar, insulin glargine; od, once daily.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confirmed hypoglycemic episodes. A: Overall confirmed hypoglycemic episodes. B: Nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemic episodes. See methodology for plotting graph in the Supplementary Data online. IDeg, insulin degludec; IGlar, insulin glargine; od, once daily.

References

    1. International Diabetes foundation. Diabetes atlas 5th edition [article online], 2011. Available from http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the-global-burden Accessed 10 January 2012
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group UKPDS 28: a randomized trial of efficacy of early addition of metformin in sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:87–92 - PubMed
    1. Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, Cull CA, Holman RR, U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care 2002;25:330–336 - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11–S61 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–1596 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data