Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;11(3):231-52.
doi: 10.1017/S1478951512000594. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

Care for the cancer caregiver: a systematic review

Affiliations

Care for the cancer caregiver: a systematic review

Allison J Applebaum et al. Palliat Support Care. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Informal caregivers (ICs) are relatives, friends, and partners who have a significant relationship with and provide assistance (i.e., physical, emotional) to a patient with a life- threatening, incurable illness. The multidimensional burden that results from providing care to a patient with cancer is well documented, and as a result, a growing number of psychosocial interventions have been developed specifically to address this burden. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the state of the science of psychosocial interventions for informal cancer caregivers.

Method: A comprehensive systematic review of interventions for cancer caregivers was conducted via an electronic literature search of publications between 1980 and January 13, 2011. A final sample of 49 interventions was reviewed in detail.

Results: The interventions, which varied in terms of modality and patient population, fell into the following eight categories: psychoeducation, problem-solving/skills building interventions, supportive therapy, family/couples therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, complementary and alternative medicine interventions, and existential therapy. Benefits and disadvantages of each of the categories are discussed, with special attention given to studies that produced null findings.

Significance of results: Beyond specific techniques, structured, goal-oriented, and time-limited interventions that are integrative appear to be the most feasible and offer the greatest benefits for ICs of cancer patients. Future studies are needed to examine the specific benefits and challenges of delivering interventions in alternative modalities (Internet, Skype) so that the needs of a greater number of ICs may be addressed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams E, Boulton M, Watson E. The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2009;77:179–186. - PubMed
    1. Andrews SC. Caregiver burden and symptom distress in people with cancer receiving hospice care. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2001;28:1469–1474. - PubMed
    1. Aoun SM, Kristjanson LJ, Currow DC, et al. Caregiving for the terminally ill: at what cost? Palliative Medicine. 2005;19:551–555. - PubMed
    1. Applebaum A. Caregiving for cancer patients: Finding meaning in the experience of giving care. Presented at the 13th World Congress of Psycho-Oncology; Analya, Turkey. 2011.
    1. Applebaum A, Stein E, Pessin H, et al. The role of therapeutic alliance in telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy for hematopoietic SCT survivors. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 2012 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types